From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nils Gillmann Subject: Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines? (-> convivenza) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:45:55 +0000 Message-ID: <20181029114555.mcxiobpqznzc36sa@abyayala> References: <11169507.O9o76ZdvQC@aleksandar-ixtreme-m5740> <20181029113703.aoglk75dihqmvsup@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gH5yc-00009O-Is for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:44:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gH5yZ-0004O3-E3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:44:58 -0400 Received: from static.195.114.201.195.clients.your-server.de ([195.201.114.195]:38168 helo=conspiracy.of.n0.pm) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gH5yZ-0004Mo-36 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:44:55 -0400 Received: by conspiracy.of.n0.pm (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 83f327e3 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181029113703.aoglk75dihqmvsup@abyayala> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Nils Gillmann transcribed 634 bytes: > I have followed most of the breaking threads, and I will keep > my contribution to simply stating what a friend wrote: > > https://mobile.twitter.com/lynXintl/status/1055146900100390913 > > In essence this refers to convivenza, which in my opinion > is a much better suited framework for this than what > has been brought up so far: > https://structure.pages.de/convivenza > > Interested groups can contract the structure work group Of course I meant "contact". Now I'm out of here. > (https://structure.pages.de/) and work out implementations. > > I don't want any follow-ups directed at myself, I don't > have the time to deal with circular discussions wrt this. > Take it as a statement of recommendation. >