From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nils Gillmann <ng0@n0.is>
Subject: Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines? (-> convivenza)
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:37:03 +0000
Message-ID: <20181029113703.aoglk75dihqmvsup@abyayala>
References: <11169507.O9o76ZdvQC@aleksandar-ixtreme-m5740>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52560)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ng0@n0.is>)
	id 1gH5rC-0001TN-US
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:37:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@n0.is>) id 1gH5r4-00013z-Bm
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:37:16 -0400
Received: from static.195.114.201.195.clients.your-server.de
	([195.201.114.195]:38094 helo=conspiracy.of.n0.pm)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ng0@n0.is>) id 1gH5r0-0008Ru-Jn
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:37:08 -0400
Received: by conspiracy.of.n0.pm (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c4343fc7
	(TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO)
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:35:59 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <11169507.O9o76ZdvQC@aleksandar-ixtreme-m5740>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org

I have followed most of the breaking threads, and I will keep
my contribution to simply stating what a friend wrote:

https://mobile.twitter.com/lynXintl/status/1055146900100390913

In essence this refers to convivenza, which in my opinion
is a much better suited framework for this than what
has been brought up so far:
https://structure.pages.de/convivenza

Interested groups can contract the structure work group
(https://structure.pages.de/) and work out implementations.

I don't want any follow-ups directed at myself, I don't
have the time to deal with circular discussions wrt this.
Take it as a statement of recommendation.