From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Patterson <ajpatter@uwaterloo.ca>
Subject: bug#32769: Packaging Next browser (Common Lisp) [work in progress]
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 23:11:20 -0400
Message-ID: <20181015231120.17d2bf7a@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
References: <87va6a7x9l.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<20181011031649.5863f9a8@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
	<87va68uatd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87sh1cu5ic.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<20181012015120.686812a8@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
	<87ftxbslyk.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<20181012182510.693c28f6@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
	<878t31kk59.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<20181015020505.2387a8c7@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
	<87o9bvk0yx.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57285)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gCFmB-0004iF-3B
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 23:12:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gCFm6-0004e1-PQ
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 23:12:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47440)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gCFm6-0004c8-E9
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 23:12:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gCFm5-0002b7-VQ
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 23:12:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.32769.B32769.15396594939946@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87o9bvk0yx.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 32769@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Pierre,

On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:34:14 +0200
Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> wrote:

> Question: do we need both "out" and "lib" outputs?
> My understanding is that "lib" is useful when one wants to start the
> program from a REPL.  Correct?

"out" will always depend on "lib" for programs.  We want to build it
the same way as other systems so that all of the source for the
program remains inspect-able at run-time, even if it's just a
one-liner.

--
Andy