From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42574)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1g8kRJ-0003Ix-RV
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2018 07:08:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1g8kRG-0000lo-Ng
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2018 07:08:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34070)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1g8kRG-0000lM-JJ
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2018 07:08:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1g8kRG-0006D1-8l
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2018 07:08:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#32948] [PATCH 01/21] gnu: Add java-batik-i18n.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.32948.B32948.153882402923799@debbugs.gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 13:06:57 +0200
From: Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu>
Message-ID: <20181006130549.265ff70e@lepiller.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20181005204923.62f79f8e@scratchpost.org>
References: <20181005154453.10159-1-dannym@scratchpost.org>
	<20181005155020.10239-1-dannym@scratchpost.org>
	<d5ae85ec575566426755d3b70a37379b@lepiller.eu>
	<20181005204923.62f79f8e@scratchpost.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: 32948@debbugs.gnu.org

Le Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:49:23 +0200,
Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> a =C3=A9crit :

> Hi Julien,
>=20
> > I also have my own version of this package that uses build.xml.  =20
>=20
> Aha? That works?!
>=20
> > So my question is, why did you split this package? Here are two
> > package definitions I use: =20
>=20
> Because I couldn't get the simpler version to work.  So your version
> is even better.

Actually my package definition uses bundled dependencies, so I think
your version is better, especially if you could remove the .jar files
from the lib/ folder.