From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#32197: bug#30993: OpenSSH sshd killed by Shepherd 0.4.0 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:57:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20180719165730.GA8867@jasmine.lan> References: <20180406124101.GB1883@jasmine.lan> <87r2mvnm29.fsf@gnu.org> <20180503163808.GA1019@jasmine.lan> <20180506195050.GD8038@jasmine.lan> <87sh4f5ptn.fsf@lassieur.org> <87muun5mj0.fsf@lassieur.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgCFi-0004kY-IX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:58:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgCFf-0004NG-Fu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:58:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgCFf-0004N2-7m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:58:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgCFf-0003Y2-0F for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:58:03 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87muun5mj0.fsf@lassieur.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: 32197@debbugs.gnu.org, 30993@debbugs.gnu.org --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 04:26:59PM +0200, Cl=E9ment Lassieur wrote: > Cl=E9ment Lassieur writes: >=20 > > Leo, if you confirm my analysis, could you please unmerge the bugs? >=20 > I did it, because Eric confirmed the fix. Thanks, sorry for the confusion! --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAltQwvcACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhBexAAgwyIwR6u2bFrxqggaqEu4E+PV5yNkEnLYynx9Nh0rROvQNeDoqZQ+Oix YKwOoPYPkY9eTHYbdvqEL1r8gGjUrSn/tBAlmGiuXTf9xVxkEmsBs1qYnKbAnTJ9 aWbCn3DtYxYkOi0hjCALb8FmPFiOcM0/7uFxfLNzwcTWq+R27AiTKAsUe3nf6zXW +32yEm/7F3gcC73HaA3+EkqzmUYTAETqxqnkNz3ODMYMk7iBUmBpZ3LyHc6nWda0 L1SZF/uV8herR7xxo1q/sHyxwsAN51CBOprIyiKinafyZDohzqcKkjffnk9rm0TZ h1IlwAWlseqZUJzIS3fCNRsmvQf1AklgZ6UafyWXxyjL6TIu0QDyV62MGwyIY69k l9YSPb+n+7X/I28hDsLLzGIFoVoJzv6vLaeRECyCTG6gQ54V61yO6v1F4O2VEkBC F2A4NN1bXQYhZnj7rPwjxmEkHNNrZRLbAoDBHE9hV9yvBA1RniTkXONupI9IV2O/ bkZitsF8N7A6jfoiqyEfCnMwegz743OAFuPc/bx1DvBFyJfwbjZ6VZexEcrbLf5T AJ/aXUmiAyve0fM6zn1ykVNwlhvK6iTBv8QkjlNb9omtJ0X+6JINUBau/7WBm/7P QVafNZpGuUyTObf1CLqiidQwu9/2VhuHaZhTLXYQRIVRX+JpnRw= =OssZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn--