From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45397) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSRnR-0003gr-IF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 14:44:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSRnO-00032n-6P for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 14:44:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSRnO-00032f-1f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 14:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fSRnN-0001rL-N0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 14:44:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#31774] [PATCH 12/22] gnu: Add maven-core. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:43:16 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic Message-ID: <20180611204316.36ec4f20@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: <20180610204631.62f0ea79@lepiller.eu> References: <20180610130104.2b154715@lepiller.eu> <20180610110319.24043-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <20180610110319.24043-12-julien@lepiller.eu> <20180610191643.15f8a63e@scratchpost.org> <20180610204631.62f0ea79@lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/rG9dAHjqbXmophC_62wa8k_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Julien Lepiller Cc: 31774@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/rG9dAHjqbXmophC_62wa8k_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Julien, yeah, looks much safer this way IMO. > So I tried to use that, and here is an updated patch. I had troubles > using match (it tried to evaluate the content of the list I wanted to > match with, although that doesn't happen at the REPL), so I used a > sequence of cdr/car instead. Thanks for the hint :) Hmm, could you post what you tried? --Sig_/rG9dAHjqbXmophC_62wa8k_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAlsewsQACgkQ5xo1VCww uqUbggf+P4jkHsFjYQSx/uV4WTA4MduBm8W5jItFKQbE/WyAwopG6vDj4lFaYXXL SU4OgIF6yg0sL2TQnc/3tDzCIuJdWH6U8TI47vV1XPzxoZXk15GIvTVTcsfY4Hxs CBsYfQmzhv0G6mBs1Qv0d3wllDgEcuUlQKo1T1IquNS2kTsuFey+o7MwxO2GOWw0 358XYuA76dpzAo/crOBCTpLWiMjM2eUwIrtyRLGA7en0qegbyLRdc6TJAkRDYGpn E+dTb+j1IaxKgmU7zGfBLlpv912NPy3stCHcuoOjjM9cjWXS+GnqyVS0JFfNFd55 sBO8QGw1S2SbvwLndJTiJ0b5xOM+bA== =hBZn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/rG9dAHjqbXmophC_62wa8k_--