From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60025) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMFxi-0007py-1R for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 12:53:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMFxe-0005su-2M for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 12:53:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMFxd-0005sm-TN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 12:53:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fMFxd-0001Ps-LQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 12:53:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#30693] Xonotic Resent-Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 16:52:54 +0000 From: Nils Gillmann Message-ID: <20180525165254.cp5p7ygrduttoa5p@abyayala> References: <20180525164150.046d365d@mykolab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tidznqsx3b4bpgkg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180525164150.046d365d@mykolab.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Rutger Helling Cc: ng0@n0.is, 30693@debbugs.gnu.org --tidznqsx3b4bpgkg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rutger Helling transcribed 1.1K bytes: > This patch has been open for quite a while! Which is a shame because it > works well. >=20 > The license talked about seems to be GPL2+, see this commit: >=20 > https://github.com/xonotic/xonotic/commit/12105b36a21e7472f72933b6dd40946= 5b5133396 >=20 > They recently changed it to GPL3+, but this current release in the > patch is still GPL2+. >=20 > Is it alright if I make those changes in the licenses and push? The software would still be GPL2+. Only when we use the new one it will be GPL3+. As long as you keep my copyright and add yours its fine for me (I worked some time to get this working). Offtopic: Did you open a new issue number to reference the old number? I was able to see threading in notmuch but not in my actual email client. Ontopic: I continued working on this in a version which only applies to my work. A friend reported to me that there are issues with one or two of the 3 possible runtime modes which should be fixed. Offtopic: I've had some patches open waiting for months (after 3 months I stopped counting), so for now I only submit what's necessary and still (freshly) applies. FYI, the vim-build-system is working just fine and I'm integrating it in my part of the software already. It just seems like we have no people at all interested (or with time on their hands) to review Vim related code. This is no critique on work done by mostly volunteers, but we could do better. It's not criticism because I have no constructive ideas how it could be managed better. --tidznqsx3b4bpgkg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlsIP2YACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYiD1Q/+Ok3tiWvJUjiG2hoseKpgO7CKHz7nkok2qvSPPQ7AMR9Z/sdFqG6rvZhD AkYFB6CpzW7ur/mcTUqloppSlwt5LgWg81HluL6ceSwiWGyk87O3DfZKSC2OoI/E 8I5gB5dTLDVno3OQ7dugJpcBixo1JhdoVvfKJQwO3sj2t8WkOotYzAX7dbe7w6m0 OoPhDzyFvfODE/a+VlFRT7K4Q6m507dtbHo5RgyGguTTfCxJ7Cyi4hKFQzVgjQoI PPhCUhcwiV3WA6MbfVtPBjwAd+07iZlzh1Pt3hew7wEtbuuZypEeEA2wFZqGtHPG M5a/+MdxbVA9kC8BOGFzyXO59Ec3ZbOKeAcjBlx+xboptBD7OCZ+92Yr0e+ue3hD ymWNYzOT6axNarQwvULAoa3OzC3CUs5dP68H0mnUGFmIsp1TGaQMXSv73o3TaOvl GfpnGY1XVWuT5hvi3uTrzMmZr7xr+fPoJGc4SIiUPt+y1gMGCdtWE7se+oEP6OSe i3I/AeZklXPqe3o/OM7ruY63u+cI31F9xZZv2o+poc0MNnBSN5/STS8DtZiGFaq4 mqHfE80eiDYVreQeS3n15Evts9Z0tpAZTyiqKnz0LXnxE2Vpba4/fK4j7nPgZIKF rt12dW+Nhf0v6IE3LJrvLV5V9dPw7axMnDXo/r0EEyV2MWidGYk= =srPg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tidznqsx3b4bpgkg--