From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nils Gillmann Subject: Re: Code of Conduct and Diversity Statement Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 07:35:41 +0000 Message-ID: <20180513073541.zja6iy3rsagexndl@abyayala> References: <20180513022722.1b2349ef@merlin.browniehive.net> <6A4B9D18-8276-4B3F-B9A9-EADBA72990A7@riseup.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHlXG-0000Mk-1Z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 03:35:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHlXE-0005jp-E7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 03:35:14 -0400 Received: from conspiracy.of.n0.is ([2a01:4f8:1c0c:7ad0::1]:46446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHlXE-0005i6-2Y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 03:35:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6A4B9D18-8276-4B3F-B9A9-EADBA72990A7@riseup.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: swedebugia Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org swedebugia transcribed 1.7K bytes: > Hi > > On May 13, 2018 2:27:22 AM GMT+02:00, Tonton wrote: > >Hi, > > > ... > > should we make the CoC more prominent or > >somehow > >inform about it better? For example by putting it or a link to it in > >the topic > >of the IRC channel, as it's own page on the website, if possible as > >part of > >the welcome message to the mailing lists, others? > > Yes I think so. I like you proposals. I knew we had one and found it via the manual. > > > > >A second question is, the contributor covenant has evolved, should we > >upgrade > >ours from 1.3.0 to the current > >[1.4.0](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct)? > > This community does not really have any maintainers or formal leadership to my knowledge. > How to handle reporting in our case could be handled by here by vote appointing a person to handle such issues (for example as a mediator like in https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Conflict_Resolution) Here's another group working on "Guidelines for Moderators of Coexistence". Their document is well-written and now translated in 3 languages: https://structure.pages.de/convivenza.en > >Would like to say that this is probably the best informatics community > >I've > >been part of and the reason I'm bringing it up is to make a statement > >that we > >care, and to make it easier for outsiders and potential participants to > >see > >that this is in fact part of our backbone. I'm so often positively > >surprised > >by the quality of communication here. > > I agree. Conflicts here seem rare and to my knowledge well handled when they do. > > Cheers > Swedebugia