From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nils Gillmann <ng0@n0.is>
Subject: Re: Building guix-modular with cuirass
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 21:23:56 +0000
Message-ID: <20180508212356.obhxtfvhc6ysjkjr@abyayala>
References: <87a7tpc8vw.fsf@gmail.com> <87po2gyhem.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87r2mwk0o7.fsf@gmail.com> <878t93nlha.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32947)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ng0@n0.is>)
	id 1fGA53-0001TL-1U
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2018 17:23:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@n0.is>) id 1fGA52-0000xO-3C
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2018 17:23:29 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <878t93nlha.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: help-guix <help-guix@gnu.org>

Ludovic Courtès transcribed 800 bytes:
> Hello,
> 
> Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com> skribis:
> 
> >> If you add a similar entry on your server, it should be fine.
> >>
> >> Can you try and report back?
> >
> > Yes you're right it works fine, thanks :)
> >
> > However, some of my machines are not picking up the substitutes builded
> > while running 'guix pull'.
> >
> > I found why, on machines that I didn't reconfigure recently,
> > 'default-guile' is guile-2.2.2, while on the cuirass machine it is
> > guile-2.2.3. When reconfiguring them before, substitutes are picked-up
> > correctly.
> 
> Oh indeed.
> 
> In the near future, I want ‘guix pull’ to install a ‘guix’ binary as
> opposed to simply dropping a bunch of modules in ~/.config/guix/latest.
> At that point we won’t have this kind of problem anymore.
> 
> Ludo’.
> 

Not trying to derail this thread too much, but could you explain that a
bit more Ludovic? I'm curious.
This is moving beyond the current change with modular guix (which still
drops a bunch of modules into the store and compiles them), correct?