From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFPJK-00079n-8y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 15:27:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFPJG-0004P4-Av for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 15:27:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFPJG-0004Oe-7a for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 15:27:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fFPJG-00047z-1j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 15:27:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#31307] [PATCH] Add MAT, the Metadata Anonymisation Toolkit from Boum Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 15:26:14 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20180506192614.GA8038@jasmine.lan> References: <87wowrj9kq.fsf@gmail.com> <877eohrgeu.fsf@gnu.org> <87vac1eqch.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vac1eqch.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Chris Marusich Cc: 31307@debbugs.gnu.org --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 02:37:34PM -0700, Chris Marusich wrote: > Upstream clarified in an email [1] that the license is GPLv2. Also, > they did explicitly remove the "or any later version" part in the > README.md file; I just missed that detail at first. However, there is > no license embedded in the source files themselves. In this case, is is > correct to add this package as GPLv2? My understanding as a non-expert is that the "or later" is always at the discretion of the author. So GPLv2 without "or later" is GPLv2, and that's how we can distribute it. --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlrvVtYACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhVPRAA38QTNpSacMH92ojyJY7cSi5P/V+KsaH1bUZM0QxaCoMbA9AFlkXat1a8 +p3liKiMkO3irAMK7p4SAUTXTK7vNWZAfVBHCewkKXlQQwdSv8DIayMM15Jv6AvJ NsDp+D90JFm/GmJgQw9rntWE7IDMu0scLJ6UxtmAMdbvOcXQ8n69j5IS6SogMqvF 2PTQY4eqGwPfGZKlEsI4GDP/nch3Mnlk02qJ0U+YRQXM0TSLlAUuVF4MXAeW4wKE m6R/fKMxi2vNLvQpkp0eyWyUXyxtuSMz/tyXa0h4xeZ6AivaW9TJZnSChbW8iyb8 cJVUbxdmmMlISzsv7gKIFkFAB1kgQWJAZdMZMzI+BQck6bppn3oPih+0eepX9yEV 62aLZBSReTNbgpb/7BKzZ1nrG1j1BQTzc2anZdxYY6pHEBLLEyoPw1+weusi8kdJ rH7IpbKR4qIGqRgGrTi7idkEdypbGZFe2Bop4YsWSxtYcGPWM+Ype0P3z1rqeK0r NPToBZZftLkRnT74PnY2HAHwE3zBsS/Wz5Ak5FDQB8IdehVyiY7wQDtFdQsAYWb+ dYGW/6yYnbohx1yAicTckWt9Hy3uf5j4tchLR0tTsmtTfs/BJ38K6OuboV2RNXRH wE+k+qfBGDlMOA/ZlTk5DV4pR4CtLl0T5qAitbJf//8rGybOPOs= =zQWF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--