From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: xkblayout-state Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:47:20 -0400 Message-ID: <20180426204720.GA20666@jasmine.lan> References: <87fu3ij2a3.fsf@gmail.com> <20180426184319.GA9681@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBnnb-0004h6-Hh for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:47:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBnnX-0005dg-LD for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:47:27 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:37929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBnnX-0005dN-Bm for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:47:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor?= Boskovits Cc: help-guix --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 08:15:23PM +0000, G=E1bor Boskovits wrote: > Sorry if I misunderstood, the intention of the author is clearly to licen= ce > the work as gpl, but some files are missing the gpl clause. Also a copy of > the license is omitted. It is mandated by term 1 of gpl. If this partial > application of gpl makes this a free software, then sorry for the noise. = In > case this software is ok for upstream, and is not packaged yet, then I > would be happy to contribute a package. Many (if not most) of our packages omit some license headers, so I don't think we should count that as a blocker. As for the missing LICENSE file, that's also suboptimal, but as you say, the author clearly intends to distribute the work as GPL2+. One could ask the author the include the LICENSE file, but I think we can go ahead with adding the software to Guix as it is now. What do you think? And others, do you think it's okay to go ahead with packaging this program? --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlriOtQACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjZSBAA3zrO14kFoIeRgmGXKiGVq29zV02eFpFiwyn7AluELgRT1cW4a7inp2DE 2kmVuZhOg6nFfp1EALPmxydp1XMsf5LOVreI64ohmNDuSwDFLkxJhxBPset5hOqa 1FoRvl0B3WbC1kf5EmVmEmlIM97FI7tApkH/It/SY0SPduPd90YAjLXS04VUFsNP Uot3qn20/qSbt2V1VKy79M61DXIDcvWKwa7UfP7TjZWTmlr5SEqNC0+ggj3zshn3 y/VGvz/myh1og8ZPZVLIR+mePUsvwA3GFH/GxbLKcU5+c8n4hAhJaiVGkiXBO+90 t6Qd7D5MHvMlQfDf9CEMgsiYXt6dRUPFPLxdb5ONfjIBKliuqvi2QKoKH/PMr48F AEjJk9xanJNrwfjT+91u65ypKus3n94vlvAUdrJIbwkbezF0maDpkW/iS+CQBmsE aimgyydfXPqcRT8ijxjIl9MCxs16BiSJ9A+h3baTY57q0yZ3dsxYZ+knspjaFFuh mS6GvoqNfcx9moCK2MRidYnEDD65OXKHzlIvlEasOnDFqVNPl70ljTeGfVoIg69K anyLPTGJPnNOeO9s3d+JHUVZZjhWbr0+7d+X8vl0fg0d8+pk72lLe3AUBQ2jzpAi T330dvJtLvOXPpDz0k6h3RlXd4iiy9G5GwWpJaKULh+RtempWNc= =d4KD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--