From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: fftw runtime cpu detection Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:29:48 -0500 Message-ID: <20180417162948.44d63d6b@centurylink.net> References: <20180405221329.GT105827@pe06.us.cray.com> <87sh883gko.fsf@gnu.org> <20180406150232.GU105827@pe06.us.cray.com> <87bmewz80u.fsf@inria.fr> <874lkoyydl.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/Eo+sKLaj.dfXGIaCB4NAB5D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8YAm-00006R-Vc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 17:29:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8YAi-0007wj-6h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 17:29:56 -0400 Received: from mail.onyx.syn-alias.com ([206.152.134.66]:18559 helo=smtp.centurylink.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8YAh-0007i6-So for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 17:29:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874lkoyydl.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: Eric Bavier , guix-devel@gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?= --Sig_/Eo+sKLaj.dfXGIaCB4NAB5D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Guix, On Fri, 06 Apr 2018 20:37:42 +0200 Marius Bakke wrote: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >=20 > > Eric Bavier skribis: > > =20 > >> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:05:43AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> =20 > >>> If that=E2=80=99s the case, I=E2=80=99d be in favor of pushing this p= atch to core-updates. =20 > >> > >> Great. I'll do some more testing. Should I send a finalized patch to > >> guix-patches when it's ready? =20 > > > > If Marius has no objections, I think you could push it directly to > > core-updates. =20 >=20 > Sounds good to me. I just pushed a couple of full-rebuild commits to > fix bootstrap-tarballs, so the Big Rebuild is still some days off. I just pushed commit 65bb22796f854cbc3eae053a80b1d64365dad376 to core-updates. I built a good portion of fftwf's dependents to check things out. The dependent audio libraries seemed to pass their tests on the build machine (an avx cpu), which gives me confidence. `~Eric --Sig_/Eo+sKLaj.dfXGIaCB4NAB5D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoMXjUi7471xkzbfw/XPKxxnTJWYFAlrWZ0wACgkQ/XPKxxnT JWaR6BAAmxc+qAFJzNFJwtQeW175pBQQ7IPLaMC5MyezsHUkProjeS2UoL0jZfaA xrlHEF8jdo6vXKt/061yJK6v3mNFEjSzoQfRRmmcXtGdxhXkFjRTaetsUb1Vdui9 iprPUjNhsnTPTcNtTkMteHysM/24bXQWWbBkvT9kWrwfVGBq8N2bSSQqN9xLOs+k enbAr/4zm07JYZJrq8YfWUQeoy3z3H1caOuUj/HuTTi0qWrO+kaBBqCqe+MmdiaI 0BV34VYj9tiILkqW5nkiPw/bMEIraj8dDUH2hnGZiXCurfAGmRo+c4XPLD27rPgc 3hAU5nv/vIj47+0FUgMjZ4G7OcpiggLZ6JoMNPhPdoxM1OIlLzTtePbDyxJiSkty 3ZHHDuoD3k+dROfFO4yid/IbPbjc4LuZzqVD+eEuN15NMQZtrcmNj/ClyiamB020 IMmdsShnucBM0YeFAr3KHlQsIuIWasd5a5MGesV/BDt7WQATqvKRc4FnjQGkq1iB iWLzeHubMxF0rfancoNN5HNlz+yOyk0cOPl6eVIiLs79XNg53bKLiXVk+4pWuIEU aSMVEJfh/Lu+ZoteZtAYh6e/zZwuGShop1zPFwa1Q/Ls0uz0eYPWAbGNONNpbY+6 Lad64+JyIVY7lTM3+WGHTu8Ew5rF1tQ4vWDX3fIdndnNOTQOueU= =xuQB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Eo+sKLaj.dfXGIaCB4NAB5D--