From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7cdq-000790-VR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 04:04:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7cdm-0000BF-2D for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 04:04:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45112) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7cdl-0000BA-UG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 04:04:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f7cdl-0004hB-Ly for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 04:04:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#31152] [PATCH 0/4] Bootstrap java-jarjar. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 10:02:54 +0200 From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <20180415100216.1af6729e@lepiller.eu> In-Reply-To: <20180414135039.11615-1-boskovits@gmail.com> References: <20180414135039.11615-1-boskovits@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 31152@debbugs.gnu.org Le Sat, 14 Apr 2018 15:50:39 +0200, G=C3=A1bor Boskovits a =C3=A9crit : > *** BLURB HERE *** >=20 > This patch series introduces the packages required to remove the > bundled asm from jarjar. This is encouraged by current policy > and needed by switching to java8, as the bundled asm version > is too old. >=20 > G=C3=A1bor Boskovits (4): > gnu: Add java-slfj4-api-bootstrap. > gnu: Add java-aqute-libg-bootstrap. > gnu: Add java-aqute-bndlib-bootstrap. > gnu: Add java-asm-bootstrap. >=20 > gnu/packages/java.scm | 44 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 44 > insertions(+) >=20 Hi G=C3=A1bor, I haven't tested these patches yet, but do you really need to define them public? Otherwise LGTM.