From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51019) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f6p4I-0000Uo-DY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:08:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f6p4F-0007Fh-6D for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:08:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f6p4E-0007FU-W7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:08:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f6p4E-0004jU-Kp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:08:02 -0400 Subject: bug#31060: [PATCH] gnu: cool-retro-term: Update to 1.0.1. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 22:07:08 -0500 From: Eric Bavier Message-ID: <20180412220708.119bd8ab@centurylink.net> In-Reply-To: <87efjt6r28.fsf@posteo.net> References: <20180404083313.24964f07@centurylink.net> <87efjt6r28.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/V8nFF3wfk0OC7wWBvO+0dM="; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: 31060-done@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/V8nFF3wfk0OC7wWBvO+0dM= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Kei, Thanks for testing the build! On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 21:50:55 -0400 Kei Kebreau wrote: > Eric Bavier writes: >=20 > > Hello Guix, > > > > This patch updates cool-retro-term to version 1.0.1. > > > > This version added a new font, Knight-TV (GPL). Rather than adjust the > > patch that removes non-free font support, I took the liberty of > > implementing a snippet that does the work. IMHO this is a bit clearer > > and more future-proof than the large patch. > > > > `~Eric =20 >=20 > Hello Eric, >=20 > This patch lints and builds reproducibly on my machine, and the changes > look fine. Thanks for your work on the snippet! It is indeed clearer > than the patch it replaces. Pushed in 306d8630dc2cb6d802a86630e301d49da04149e8 `~Eric --Sig_/V8nFF3wfk0OC7wWBvO+0dM= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoMXjUi7471xkzbfw/XPKxxnTJWYFAlrQHtwACgkQ/XPKxxnT JWYKGA/8DNK25rEleSosp0wiYBi9XQd4ZY0BGH/u1ugCh8J1C1oDZ+rH/aW44R8Y y7Fzgva1C6TAcex/rHJrMJfqBpfn7P+tQzVri1U80guAb1P9G1+Eteq9Ev17ky1B 6uNsoZtOuY9StWuZTYYiYrSNOWrWVtkoljd3/uKO06KoHKZ6ez95xj37snrCf0ie mJH1XPa6u/8QiiAcX6TXPDlRBdl3eDt1dY2TNJZvUDc5liv0CfnQUDHd5VAWCiJZ rp68mFevKKMP1+bmdkVBtnqhOTYel4+UU9jqvvOEMoIm3KwGGcB30sd9yC4DKUZI 1BtHgPftub737EWd0Ikr1OtO9Ksy08sHP/CWwjU8OU04rIjILNaSDaNfWtnK4PdA 0v+SkbmRrij4JRNS7W6r6BUhyqKXPjnD6tU3UMCM4JYx3vjRcNIqUbNcF0KAqdFs hYLnOyUG3HFgBm1aT5d07t1XvOKPb8l9e8WkRG9ncKpHGcEls9P3Yb30h38ugBr4 b/HoVXXv6C6SGG/CAM/iSOK1wa/7WMCyIqcnZT5cAewn+fV5On4Vx5Zta9X7x05S jMtKkb6AMq0/VCrxNekQ5zOJBup2Qcet9dpUZM4SnMZzSNtPEZanqcK8I2YgMhF9 7Aeoe8qvGqqYdUOvX2hVIdc0OeI+fKoUqdbpIhmvUnHT6PbrSug= =3gis -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/V8nFF3wfk0OC7wWBvO+0dM=--