From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nils Gillmann <ng0@n0.is>
Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c.
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:00:21 +0000
Message-ID: <20180403170021.jmctpswhcfniblt3@abyayala>
References: <20180403124356.20162.76789@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20180403124357.2ECCC204DA@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<874lksbf8f.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvssv2rs.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87sh8cv2ok.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34193)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ng0@n0.is>)
	id 1f3PI5-0003uo-N6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:00:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@n0.is>) id 1f3PHw-0006OL-8X
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:00:13 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87sh8cv2ok.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Roel Janssen transcribed 509 bytes:
> 
> Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> >
> >> Hi Roel,
> >>
> >> roel@gnu.org (Roel Janssen) skribis:
> >>
> >>> +    (license (package-license perl))))
> >>
> >> Could you use (license perl-license) instead?  It doesn’t make any
> >> difference in this case but it’s generally “safer” (see (guix
> >> licenses)).

Can you tell me why it is safer to say perl-license instead of package-license perl?

> > Of course!  If I may ask, is the coreutils input and the substitution OK?
> 
> Nevermind, I'm mixing this up with another Perl package.
> 
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ludo’.
> 
>