From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nils Gillmann <ng0@n0.is> Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c. Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:00:21 +0000 Message-ID: <20180403170021.jmctpswhcfniblt3@abyayala> References: <20180403124356.20162.76789@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180403124357.2ECCC204DA@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <874lksbf8f.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvssv2rs.fsf@gnu.org> <87sh8cv2ok.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34193) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ng0@n0.is>) id 1f3PI5-0003uo-N6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:00:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ng0@n0.is>) id 1f3PHw-0006OL-8X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:00:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sh8cv2ok.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." <guix-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>, <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>, <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> To: Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org> Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Roel Janssen transcribed 509 bytes: > > Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org> writes: > > > Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes: > > > >> Hi Roel, > >> > >> roel@gnu.org (Roel Janssen) skribis: > >> > >>> + (license (package-license perl)))) > >> > >> Could you use (license perl-license) instead? It doesn’t make any > >> difference in this case but it’s generally “safer” (see (guix > >> licenses)). Can you tell me why it is safer to say perl-license instead of package-license perl? > > Of course! If I may ask, is the coreutils input and the substitution OK? > > Nevermind, I'm mixing this up with another Perl package. > > > > >> Thanks, > >> Ludo’. > >