From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49420)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1f0pcu-000800-UB
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:31:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1f0pcs-0005DC-9h
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:31:04 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48204)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1f0pcs-0005D3-5j
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:31:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1f0pcs-0007xg-17
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:31:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#30960] [PATCH 0/4] Switch to font-build-system
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.30960.B30960.152216101430545@debbugs.gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:30:28 +0000
From: ng0 <ng0@n0.is>
Message-ID: <20180327143028.mxshqym6xedvrjzp@abyayala>
References: <20180327084914.19263-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
	<20180327090810.2mvgm23ra7m6mj35@abyayala>
	<cu7sh8lemph.fsf@systemreboot.net>
	<20180327134721.5bgxmbnqpsjcthmb@abyayala>
	<cu7po3pehfk.fsf@systemreboot.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cu7po3pehfk.fsf@systemreboot.net>
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Cc: ng0 <ng0@n0.is>, 30960@debbugs.gnu.org

Arun Isaac transcribed 1.3K bytes:
> 
> > phase `install-license-files' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> > starting phase `reset-gzip-timestamps'
> > find-files: /gnu/store/8zr56l7gh1rh76l8gdyy2j5hn84r56nv-font-lato-2.010: No such file or directory
> > phase `reset-gzip-timestamps' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> > starting phase `compress-documentation'
> > phase `compress-documentation' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> > builder for `/gnu/store/85xg1bvd3xq79y41f7rvasy73jzpkcba-font-lato-2.010.drv' failed to produce output path `/gnu/store/8zr56l7gh1rh76l8gdyy2j5hn84r56nv-font-lato-2.010'
> > @ build-failed /gnu/store/85xg1bvd3xq79y41f7rvasy73jzpkcba-font-lato-2.010.drv - 1 builder for `/gnu/store/85xg1bvd3xq79y41f7rvasy73jzpkcba-font-lato-2.010.drv' failed to produce output path `/gnu/store/8zr56l7gh1rh76l8gdyy2j5hn84r56nv-font-lato-2.010'
> > guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/85xg1bvd3xq79y41f7rvasy73jzpkcba-font-lato-2.010.drv' failed
> >
> > Which could be what I experienced when I first tried to build it with the font-build-system
> > and then switched to what it uses now in master.
> 
> I tried building font-lato again on my machine, and it worked. I suspect
> this problem you are facing is due to the __MACOSX folders in the zip

Out of scope of this patchset, but:
Those aren't really necessary in the use. Couldn't we just instruct the font-build-system
to ignore and/or delete them?

> archive. I'm sending in a new patchset with url-fetch/zipbomb instead of
> url-fetch. Let me know if it works.
>
> Thanks.