From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0oxL-0007lu-Ob for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:48:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0oxG-0000FH-50 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:48:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47435) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0oxG-0000F4-0e for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:48:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f0oxF-0006mJ-LI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:48:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#30960] [PATCH 0/4] Switch to font-build-system Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 13:47:21 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20180327134721.5bgxmbnqpsjcthmb@abyayala> References: <20180327084914.19263-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <20180327090810.2mvgm23ra7m6mj35@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: ng0 , 30960@debbugs.gnu.org Arun Isaac transcribed 585 bytes: > ng0 writes: > > > Arun Isaac transcribed 430 bytes: > >> If someone could do a quick sanity check on these patches, I'll push. > > > > What does that mean? Did you not build them? Or just a simple request > > for review? > > I built all packages successfully. This is just a request to check > commit messages, point out any simple typos, etc. Okay > > I know I had my reasons for not using font-build-system with lato, but > > maybe you succeeded. > > Yes, I was able to build font-lato using the font-build-system. If you > have an issue with using the font-build-system, do let me know. So I applied all your patches, all except lato built without errors. Lato: ... phase `install-license-files' succeeded after 0.0 seconds starting phase `reset-gzip-timestamps' find-files: /gnu/store/8zr56l7gh1rh76l8gdyy2j5hn84r56nv-font-lato-2.010: No such file or directory phase `reset-gzip-timestamps' succeeded after 0.0 seconds starting phase `compress-documentation' phase `compress-documentation' succeeded after 0.0 seconds builder for `/gnu/store/85xg1bvd3xq79y41f7rvasy73jzpkcba-font-lato-2.010.drv' failed to produce output path `/gnu/store/8zr56l7gh1rh76l8gdyy2j5hn84r56nv-font-lato-2.010' @ build-failed /gnu/store/85xg1bvd3xq79y41f7rvasy73jzpkcba-font-lato-2.010.drv - 1 builder for `/gnu/store/85xg1bvd3xq79y41f7rvasy73jzpkcba-font-lato-2.010.drv' failed to produce output path `/gnu/store/8zr56l7gh1rh76l8gdyy2j5hn84r56nv-font-lato-2.010' guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/85xg1bvd3xq79y41f7rvasy73jzpkcba-font-lato-2.010.drv' failed Which could be what I experienced when I first tried to build it with the font-build-system and then switched to what it uses now in master. > Thanks! > > >