From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyyv0-0005gO-Sp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:02:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyyuw-00017N-Qn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:02:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39003) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyyuw-00017C-N0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:02:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eyyuv-0007rN-NR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:02:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#30864] mailutils: fix TODO note and build with mariadb sql Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:01:40 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20180322120140.kai2m3y5qnuludpl@abyayala> References: <20180319205014.xpdwnfop6etcappz@abyayala> <871sgcibfy.fsf@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <871sgcibfy.fsf@inria.fr> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: ng0 , 30864@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès transcribed 700 bytes: > Hello, > > ng0 skribis: > > > mailutils had this note to build it with sql. > > > > I picked mariadb, the attached patch builds alright. > > > > But: > > Why do we want this? mariadb adds *very much* to the size of the package and its > > dependencies. > > [...] > > > total: 158.8 MiB > > [...] > > > total: 695.8 MiB > > That’s multiplied by 4.5, so I’d rather not do it, especially since it > doesn’t contribute to a core functionality of Mailutils AFAIK. Yep, it's not very good. > That said, the main problem here is the size of mariadb (and mysql), > which take 200–300 MiB alone (not the closure). We can revisit this > issue when we’ve made them smaller. > > How does that sound? > > Ludo’. It's okay with me. Do you think we should close this bug for now? -- A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 https://n0.is