On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:15:22AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I’m late to the party, but I’m wondering in this case if, instead of
> grafting, we should simply add an util-linux@2.31a package, and make
> sure GuixSD uses that one in %base-packages.
> 
> That way, both GuixSD and manually installed util-linux would get the
> Bash completion fix.  It’s probably OK that packages that depend on
> util-linux don’t get the fixed version because users don’t get bash
> completion from there.
> 
> WDYT?

What do you think of the attached patch?