From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43264) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewtXP-00082Q-I7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:53:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewtXK-0000sY-Nd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:53:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewtXK-0000sO-JB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ewtXK-000474-69 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:53:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28004] Chromium Resent-Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:52:25 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20180316175225.7jf4k2qaciyxnepp@abyayala> References: <87vag16g5z.fsf@gnu.org> <87fu75aar5.fsf@fastmail.com> <874lnkr0vf.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaejvclc.fsf@fastmail.com> <20180226200133.zsnahblbgzovrtmu@abyayala> <87muzvv7ku.fsf@fastmail.com> <20180226234144.032af030@alma-ubu> <87woyxt3nz.fsf@fastmail.com> <20180316173044.dctlydfij7smndxd@abyayala> <87h8pfc3tr.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mkofdllgcgyb6gch" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h8pfc3tr.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 28004@debbugs.gnu.org, ng0 --mkofdllgcgyb6gch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marius Bakke transcribed 1.4K bytes: > ng0 writes: >=20 > > I think we found it to be good enough to be included in master, or did = I miss anything? > > > > Would be nice if I could drop my local patch (and building). The team a= round Taler seems > > to be interested in it as well as far as I can remember our chats in Le= ipzig. >=20 > Reading up on GNU Taler, Chromium seems like a poor choice for an > anonymous payment system. Why not GNU IceCat? I don't see Chromium > becoming stable enough for guaranteed privacy any time soon. And a full > fork would require a large maintenance team. Why: Ask Taler directly, I'm not involved with them. And on for what: It is just for the Browser extension. No one is forking Chromium again. > Unfortunately I got busy after the latest update, and haven't had time > to work on 65 yet. I will send an update once I get around to it, and > also try some other Inox patches and see if they help with the "first > launch" issue -- hopefully within a week or two. Cool, thanks! And thanks for your continued work on this. I'll definitely try to help out once it is in master. --=20 A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 https://n0.is --mkofdllgcgyb6gch Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlqsBFkACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYhN/Q/9FpjVSMbtxcBVIhXk56gnCGGhohJxTKVVqsGrru/ZpO3XO0Sq5aOhvyPx JkYG2iYL0pJboltQWFWw/NO4JRYVdTt/mNZMyaL/R3vd/eSQb7DqpohUOq9CKcJ8 a76LvqaLqTrAYrVCOLEYYayiKzxlky5HZLt1vkQ4MEW8h3gdVEicHa5axhICPuX+ brbXZTilWgCI2DZPhaSIdrEHeGMqXldhmskMz55Wq3mJiBStQisTbiIdd+KLHfMh Ur407LLJxzghb3X0HSMH49Lk1A1k9xWothMM0dIQ6M2rvh2mJD/RMEyBER/B9bTu 3c+rOIuspsyVs7r9E6+S+0dR84R/XY3Eg9jVArNy5cF7fnEqYxUFXqeXs4Zbntlb sDicqs/XpdxqTKHymzpIbL02LpLoF8j+zdSo9Hz3mVpqR3Kd55JkBZBV7I+WzHBy fa6MWMpLNvLblonUqgu83SmWetky0YfDQSApWpvM0kAbiGDbyoV1pPNcW39nJJ1k Vv4E0MwGFFCXRkWyX4zJgimkkPEZkaYUNz4IFbdxNazEhMdqp2HnuVzuHbfNvlX4 hGnpGhWwXyz3Z4mw/y5IkQlVD6WjziSIDUDHgdqTY/i71JfH9LdaDC6l2vKkgylE B2oc6nrQDGJ5J0pRryhSp0XTsQK3i0fy//ZuavF5etCa83PXhnY= =Ai+x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mkofdllgcgyb6gch--