From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:21:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20180314182111.GA20258@thebird.nl> References: <87371tqbyb.fsf@elephly.net> <20180223165953.GA6088@thebird.nl> <871sgn1xhf.fsf@gnu.org> <20180313214431.GA15654@thebird.nl> <3713e2d0-600f-d624-03b6-19096643c876@crazy-compilers.com> <20180314074941.GA18245@thebird.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewB5h-0002tG-A3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:25:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewB5d-0000Sr-4j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:25:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Hartmut Goebel Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:04:21AM +0100, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Hi Pjotr, > > no offense meant, but I have the impression you did not read my analysis > and proposals, did you? No offense taken. I did and do read them, but the analysis is not exactly accessible for my small brain, especially when you go into symlinks in part 3. No need to over-analyse. Sometimes you just have to try and see what breaks. We probably are talking at cross-purposes. Pj.