From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53449) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ew034-0004Ti-Cg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 02:38:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ew030-0002M4-Dr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 02:38:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ew030-0002Lu-9q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 02:38:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ew02z-0005QW-Vr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 02:38:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#30606] maven resolver packages Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:36:38 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Message-ID: <20180314073638.385d73c8@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <20180225164822.60ae5c2a@lepiller.eu> References: <20180225164822.60ae5c2a@lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/Gn7Zz_k9W1XR+lS184YMgbE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Julien Lepiller Cc: 30606@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/Gn7Zz_k9W1XR+lS184YMgbE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Julien, sorry I was slower reviewing than you commiting this one. On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 16:48:22 +0100 Julien Lepiller wrote: > Hi, >=20 > here are the first few packages needed by maven. I created a new > maven.scm file for them. All 5 look good, besides maybe this remark: These packages are used to bootstrap Maven. Once we have Maven and a maven-build-system, we eventually want to rebuild them with Maven and have them in some (to be defined) Guix-Maven-Layout, for example with pom.xml included and in the usual .m2/repository directory-structure. Should we thus rename them to maven-*-bootstrap and just (define them instead of (define-public? Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/Gn7Zz_k9W1XR+lS184YMgbE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlqowvcACgkQvyhstlk+X/2gNgCfSpJyJ1hg3IeqTP4pcZcGOH1t EhEAn3WLSOoVO+lRi388rv/Dvv5NTSfh =iowt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Gn7Zz_k9W1XR+lS184YMgbE--