From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33051) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etYzI-0005pp-0I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:20:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etYzC-0001p3-3T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:20:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etYzC-0001oV-0z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:20:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1etYzB-0003ZU-OG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:20:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#30693] Xonotic Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 13:19:32 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20180307131932.extvfxqdmnxkfiut@abyayala> References: <20180303233427.olbz5visu3c5urms@abyayala> <87371ct50m.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <87371ct50m.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: ng0 , 30693@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s transcribed 316 bytes: > Hi ng0, >=20 > ng0 skribis: >=20 > > This adds xonotic. I'm not sure about the "x11" license part. >=20 > Rather than hope that Someone=E2=84=A2 will check the license, could you = take a > look and let us know? :-) >=20 > Definitions in (guix licenses) contain URLs to the full license texts, > if in doubt. >=20 > TIA, > Ludo=E2=80=99. I just compared "server/rcon.pl" to the text of X11 license and all that's missing is: Except as contained in this notice, the name of the X Consortium shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or other dealings in this Software without prior written authorization =66rom the X Consortium. X Window System is a trademark of X Consortium, Inc. So I'd say this is x11-style and not x11, is this correct? According to "COPYING", I also need to add gpl3 to the gpl2. They state that all contributions are gpl2+, do I have to state gpl3 then? I (or: the tool I used) missed some licenses, so I'll have to send a new version of the patches. --=20 A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 https://n0.is/~ng0