Marius Bakke transcribed 1.6K bytes: > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > > > nckx pushed a commit to branch core-updates > > in repository guix. > > > > commit 3d2d5ebffae6979376d64a6441a44eb4369a1e96 > > Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice > > Date: Thu Jan 4 22:49:22 2018 +0000 > > > > gnu: gnurl: Add HTTP/2 support. > > > > * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnurl)[inputs]: Add nghttp2:lib. > > --- > > gnu/packages/gnunet.scm | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm b/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm > > index 29bfc81..3b25bce 100644 > > --- a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm > > +++ b/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm > > @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ authentication and support for SSL3 and TLS.") > > "doc")) ; 1.5 MiB of man3 pages > > (inputs `(("gnutls" ,gnutls/dane) > > ("libidn" ,libidn) > > + ("nghttp2" ,nghttp2 "lib") > > ("zlib" ,zlib))) > > (native-inputs > > `(("libtool" ,libtool) > > As far as I can tell, we don't have an nghttp2 package yet :-) Why? I don't even intend to support http/2 with gnURL. gnURL is not cURL. Are there any reasons why this should be build in? I'm open for suggestions and wouldn't make it a Guix exclusive thing. I know that for example the inofficial Gentoo ebuild is still being invoked with wrong configure flags. I'm not even sure if the resulting gnurl in this case would include http2 support, unless I missed disabling this in the configure script. I hate it when more than 1 list is CC'd, but I'd like to get input from some of the other GNUnet developers. Thanks for notifying me. -- ng0 :: https://n0.is | https://crash.cx A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588