From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: bug#30537: glibc 2.26 refuses to run on CentOS 6.8 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:30:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20180222203054.GC4154@macbook41> References: <87eflgstqt.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87d110stkn.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87a7w4ssmx.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <878tbosr7h.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87bmgiey3k.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qtZFehHsKgwS5rPz" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoxW8-0006fp-6h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:31:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoxW5-0007BW-2H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:31:00 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:37412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoxW4-0007A3-QX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:30:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bmgiey3k.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus , 30537@debbugs.gnu.org --qtZFehHsKgwS5rPz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 06:12:31PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Hi Ricardo, >=20 =2E.. >=20 > We seem to be oscillating on the question of whether to graft these > early GLIBCs. In June 2017, I switched to using 'package/inherit' here > in commit 13f7f2fd2b208c29361ef2290f55911879a6adf2, and in October those > changes were reverted in commit 848f550f2c105326dc3be4033c8aaf35ec21cde4 > by Efraim, although I'm not sure why. >=20 Probably a misunderstanding on my part, I assumed it was switched to package/inherit as part of the grafting, and then should be switched back. > It'll be painful to have *everything* grafted until the next > core-updates cycle, but I suppose it's necessary. >=20 > Thanks, > Mark >=20 We could also have an 'ungraft everything' branch before we get to the next round of core-updates. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --qtZFehHsKgwS5rPz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAlqPKHsACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1EpqBAAj58A7DWMu6MZ+ufrQjxROiiZtHEIFTQYUSKvh+YSdmqyhfQpWotFm9h6 XHxqiVt/kfi/e0fH3axkLYtHeJptIHxFuYj94mqLLv4Ho6qMyrdi5xIjX5s+CN9o hsnl7RbFrH3MHbPL39cVWgdDi3nJwLzqCvgFxyPbxrTtmrlesW/GdfzqMSn+6gZ0 6h68KuRQjTW/1UJb7XNjUS0fLXoUlHPGSPk6KtaGugIWfgVHDV8WxgZ6yaH1+abY hOByw6vDCYeyt2jW1vhjRi8SsvmXKjGVNdX+LgLN5eIxk5gpBke0K0tfBSJfrybP gCEDTtUzxsO7WMVCIbU8Lf7DRTubtZfiqoZIdDPEygY5xq0Al9WsF8oBgae3Wuyk 3NE4iwiI0QWwlb/z17H/3Zi7E2YRYqsy+xgEGoyRFhW+3ekLrM6vN1l/moz2JfPF xRoAN2H9kY7nouwfMnsbsABLgyuOllJdZgtfdRhoOSG+uCEcLuoU0QzMEXtyrPig tQx3MsJ1UH0Z8+GBgSFUC6wEXDapYDZ/zl6bqWHxe6X4N4P6CqQlkLxU/k1PRgO2 /3BLNrSzCfpkBwDHKsuYof7fHPSuBv/ecW1dkHgCz/KASRP2hbg+Bxv+NUIF1Jbi Y7PpkJ47RpLfR/TbBCb8CpO61zWI0myaxeVU6QOiZeOyG7lVAo8= =JZey -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qtZFehHsKgwS5rPz--