From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34797) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eowVK-0004N6-4F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:26:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eowVG-00072D-5B for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:26:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48970) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eowVG-00071g-0F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:26:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eowVF-0006i1-Qm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:26:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#30575] [PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 6.12. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:25:52 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20180222192552.GB23632@jasmine.lan> References: <20180222165621.2297-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180222165621.2297-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 30575@debbugs.gnu.org --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 05:56:21PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (racket): Update to 6.12. > [arguments]<#:phases>[patch-/bin/sh]: Add substitution. > @@ -484,6 +484,9 @@ implementation techniques and as an expository tool.") > (lambda _ > (substitute* "collects/racket/system.rkt" > (("/bin/sh") (which "sh"))) > + (substitute* "src/racket/src/schpriv.h" > + ;; Our gcc version is too old so signbit is not a builtin. > + (("MZ_IS_NEG_ZERO") "MZ_IS_NEG_ZEROdisable")) > #t))) Would it make sense to just user a newer version of GCC for Racket? --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlqPGUAACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhZtQ//Vs1QqvopkiYqm01TKSHF+E8oLBavK1wkVesav6YopJMlfbkIkhnMB5aW KtNEJ1Kz8bwK/9WB1QK/4voleSN/ZrP4DD400dqLZzyLlJq4Plw8hqg/B1O8NTMx Ea74CgUcdVs1njDb9m0O24Y8zQ1vzxBfd3pTyXDP/YuxBfPzpKUA+BWIVlm7xD1V CD3nxEl+/w9U9Xh9ywsBcEl5O6JUDLoqIkyK7XXbltWXyvNMyowXmHkRDACmySyS 62jOM5o48p1C8WVzV9//mShx8MxHXIcdIKH4Tg9i8JAwMnt2FZ3tPNeyS4Ll1qZ/ Vc2UfggQtQwy2C2u5KLmFik1GDhWARz8qKzDSlpB0Z/Me0StltSte9ruKfFrQwAG mDkUF4FC6C8E4m7wxm6veOzD1+TeACphF/sQ1O3xwTIqAZPH9SI3zc0om5ikMxwC B5DSnmjTXaKsyBjurzuTNLeeewCbtp5HYESI6Y9YcD1eors13WxsyhbqRC2ENyc8 nYwjXFxeeHCva3MIW0qUs2MvOcgBCr4/mXf5mETy/ZbZwHKPgp2Kjd5+vApd7t2J ZljV4JH0ikHtj6nqIOwAfEBd588DvD2Z2zUDjGZQojCo7ADpzDUGiWJwI+BCnnml b0IGjRNW9cQsBT1Wagwsj9Dx/xS9IpbB7HcoK73m/xusHhvTH9I= =hglM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f--