From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: core-updates, last call? Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 22:45:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20180218214508.GA9706@thebird.nl> References: <87a7waodaa.fsf@netris.org> <87o9kq7gt9.fsf@elephly.net> <877eretkos.fsf@ngyro.com> <87sh9z6aqa.fsf@elephly.net> <87po536a3k.fsf@elephly.net> <20180217151800.GA32556@jurong> <87mv0761go.fsf@elephly.net> <877erbjshw.fsf@netris.org> <20180217202408.GA18836@jasmine.lan> <87lgfr5hs6.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enWpV-0000nj-A1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 16:49:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enWpS-0004uC-67 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 16:49:05 -0500 Received: from mail.thebird.nl ([95.154.246.10]:54839) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enWpR-0004ra-Vx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 16:49:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lgfr5hs6.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel I fixed ldc. Would like it to go into core updates... It is not such a critical package. But still. On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:16:09AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >=20 > Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 03:00:59PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > >> Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> > I=E2=80=99ll merge core-updates into master now. > >>=20 > >> Is that premature? There are still over 500 newly failed jobs on > >> core-updates compared to master. > >>=20 > >> https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109914?compare=3D109912 > > > > Since GHC is still broken, I agree it's premature. >=20 > But it=E2=80=99s not broken. Some of our messages crossed, but the lat= est > status is that with my change to ghc-mtl we can build ghc-resourcet > now. So GHC is fine and all of the Haskell packages are fine. >=20 > We just didn=E2=80=99t start a new evaluation since then. >=20 > > Otherwise, are there any in particular that count as "blockers"? > > > > We've been preparing this branch for quite a while and nobody has bee= n > > motivated to fix them... >=20 > I don=E2=80=99t see any blockers any more. >=20 > --=20 > Ricardo >=20 > GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC > https://elephly.net >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20