From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: core-updates, last call? Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:24:08 -0500 Message-ID: <20180217202408.GA18836@jasmine.lan> References: <87zi4b744f.fsf@elephly.net> <20180214234721.4e9fe198@scratchpost.org> <87a7waodaa.fsf@netris.org> <87o9kq7gt9.fsf@elephly.net> <877eretkos.fsf@ngyro.com> <87sh9z6aqa.fsf@elephly.net> <87po536a3k.fsf@elephly.net> <20180217151800.GA32556@jurong> <87mv0761go.fsf@elephly.net> <877erbjshw.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1en91r-0005Px-5W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:24:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1en91o-0004YU-0s for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:24:15 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:47201) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1en91n-0004Vf-Rg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:24:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877erbjshw.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 03:00:59PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > > I=E2=80=99ll merge core-updates into master now. >=20 > Is that premature? There are still over 500 newly failed jobs on > core-updates compared to master. >=20 > https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109914?compare=3D109912 Since GHC is still broken, I agree it's premature. Otherwise, are there any in particular that count as "blockers"? We've been preparing this branch for quite a while and nobody has been motivated to fix them... --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlqIj2gACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgSsxAA5gNLj3x9zWTO4oA5rBKbSM1CfoywaXuISvCX6tMej3qzM+nj3rtozDl4 rLSInaW8KE5Ab0f+Y5X653kwfWRtzj5lPzsPS/8teVtE7+Vc9ia7Yn9GPM6dJnQK GKXx0dqeaQcQSluAEqW79VzFYpCUlv9kbGgpclmuci8W3yfOtSZVdBfTgFY9yqGN fo+BrD+lVqhKwn/aO1LLWlTxUpfM3rcdXUNgcct32eQYEWotAFAPRWcKyBXrKAQS jL/Sv4MmHVKYtug+vM1t8VxiYhAKeNwwAyfm1czz0+b/iAq/xTySyXbFyC46YkhQ DBe5FhNsFQQUua+y5wsWNUP1JQQ2FLEqBjMpi244z+XLJYKA92AmiTQS98Ur9otp i3xmob+HgCp5jta4TQUgsdNkRW/DLPjDVmA5zT5eqk3wADlLg0WKXrwW1NtzeadG HF+aisJ5qfStsZztpy1oq8/awrBMGOOFFUfdTyHHfWWA+nRCLkHezySlilR59gfb MyIDfB+TCE4fldBmDEpX2ZqnjWlqewhicBpbywmodqPYsl6ngUjL+Hi1/xIjJTK+ yQAa+lxacxfQ+hEEODgqjxCV1/Auq4RjJGzWKntZUs4Cr9ZImZUdXta4JfGgrYiB AmIYSOVwBsG6lCgImfGpmybas4LRdaNVvix6RUVM03+u4oYqLII= =qhFM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK--