From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Let's fix core-updates! Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 21:51:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20180213195126.GD1639@macbook41> References: <876075pne8.fsf@gmail.com> <877erldr1k.fsf@fastmail.com> <874lmojy7w.fsf@elephly.net> <873728jxc4.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Oiv9uiLrevHtW1RS" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45939) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elgc0-0006Hl-0W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:51:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elgbw-0007e2-VR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:51:32 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:53100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elgbw-0007de-NV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:51:28 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <873728jxc4.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Oiv9uiLrevHtW1RS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:26:03PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >=20 > Ricardo Wurmus writes: >=20 > > Marius Bakke writes: > > > >> * SBCL: > >> > >> I don't know anything about this package, so not sure what to do about > >> it. It has 45 dependents, including MATE, so merging without it is not > >> great. I tried updating to the latest version, which made the build > >> succeed, but then many of the dependent packages failed. > > > > Oh, I updated sbcl on core-updates before seeing your message. > > I=E2=80=99ll take a look at the dependent packages tomorrow. >=20 > Actually, I just built r-shiny (which depends on uglify-js, which > depends on sbcl) without problems. Also built sbcl-stumpwm, so I think > sbcl is really fine now. >=20 sbcl currently doesn't build on aarch64, but this is no change from current master. clisp is about to get a version bump but we can deal with that when its actually released. Sounds like this part is good. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Oiv9uiLrevHtW1RS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAlqDQb4ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1GMFw/9EYwpERXDA48x6WbEggRa4exlUj1U09UynRnl8qg2kOvYvA6eCfIAhRVB kcajQcN+kSYJ2Mw5GKK6HKegC8SKtMa4ohpvF+JGhd72BF1rzeklK1vKAxsfmg+Y AUWfJSkk736PFOytlrCt3mmhslWTMcIgVSqzOf/v3fJ7ygVFRbj0bWJFm+XKW0Zw 3HXQ6sALnjoyRJhrSgPZD5d+t/uLkNbOTd4JTGFT0vRl3EWHVJOotssJqV5a/iCV /g6FI2WXhS92aImATEvZBT5W7B72OV9BFzKG7I3AAPlFGhLwRIdlDyT9PicRS6SB rv7ZXkd77oLYnhx/yhV1ofJwYw8mr9LIsHMidVXcUXlTtWEp0Oe4NdmA07ThGS2p IpK4R8TGGLCgEOBvD8AUAnF1V8ybBDGsjD/HVbIeX8j9JpVuFCP9+EkhvzsAupoy /FsTojcSEbtf9e2yN3zuUmwyZYmmhQ4I7mYQ/c5Ts4usJg7+rvtHlT+vaMJtIn1n DzXGUFpAcorASzgHOQ5flgrUngJzNYmNl1sgh/2O/6726wcXXqiZkO2X2QEGbzMz fzGWOB7Sqz1IMPI9k2ky04PzlVq0eF9GBBQtWKyYgKCVM18ps+EUFAgI+OjVspFv Y6RqZP3D1Tj2nX0isBcv4ybeaIJ/miBuIkKdd8U/x5J+7h1cV9Y= =9hLK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Oiv9uiLrevHtW1RS--