On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 06:23:07PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:52:41 +0100 > Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > > > I think it would work better if when installing python@3, a ‘python’ > > executable would be available in the PATH. Maybe there is a technical > > reason for not doing so, but I find its absence rather confusing. > > For backward compatibility, the 'python' executable always has to be Python 2. > > A lot of old scripts specify just "/usr/bin/env python" in the shebang. > > On the other hand if your script supports Python 3 you know it. > We do also have the 'python-wrapper' package which uses python3 as python -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted