From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#30394: ARM compilation via qemu binfmt - Assertion failure Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:07:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20180211010728.GB28859@jasmine.lan> References: <87bmh4qrf5.fsf@abyayala.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87bmh3kbd9.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1vqv23v.fsf@abyayala.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20180208174238.2abc85dc@scratchpost.org> <87fu68o1dd.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NMuMz9nt05w80d4+" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekg7B-00085v-36 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:07:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekg78-000854-CQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:07:33 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:57993) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekg78-00084k-79 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:07:30 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fu68o1dd.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Chris Marusich Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 30394@debbugs.gnu.org, ng0@n0.is --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 12:45:18AM +0100, Chris Marusich wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic writes: >=20 > > This is only fixed in glibc 2.27 (not in core-updates). >=20 > Should we upgrade glibc in core-updates, then? Or is it better to do it > in the next core-updates cycle, to avoid still more unexpected breakage? It's too late in this cycle. Upgrading glibc would require a full rebuild and would introduce new failures. --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlp/l1AACgkQJkb6MLrK fwh4GxAAkLGGmGIDoiHr6i+qUFKLwrwbWIF7XV+OGX/8DX9j2Kin65WdJb6IduDz ixXadA7UiOqdWouuaSq/cw/6zZuvKJZ8SXNNu3noGbseWlF7f2o+uwkhBUdFnUVZ YipiQGmDDarMo+2ImTyFuYtLMEaHqiw9YK2rLhsTCj0VUk+X37zoOvM4DYJ2mpxX KIdxxGjuxHtHgbOCJdgPn29Gh5xVvnwr+ZTCpLxBQa0f3z/SrU8v8/ibWKOyciaE M09/PkQY6rYCWD3R01KFOnz98sQt3///BzSoRZnDs6c73M68ElTDxrAXiL3dOfj/ J/uuJd4WUJLHcuaVpsoaBEdWBs2KcQiwwcv+vRlIZ3bWOLxlcvrjb8gv49DirJkB lZWqTYNEom8GQOdUq/zrOdLqC2NhRbZtTPZO/s7ceEY+itLwoyO4TDtjyTbBD2iq NlE/zK8+E9NIl0pQevVgsOmcI5hpUeuS4OCv0+L3k5SD3uAFXw0MGa3Pljqwir/n tq6FiqppBON1gPK8c21v/+gqeEhR33Z+4hcg24jH7+1TyAtz7kK0bUcvS2H+V5Bb 3/S+UcC+9LxnmOstIzsetfLe7dMUTQFCq1VvPX28tm+DT9ylcIc+wKhmokva0uYr 3UmsoPjpDDzZEhu5/gxnGUIzq7dC7SDlXGoT4GBwpwfsrmD5FqI= =T/Z0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+--