From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: Include Proot-static with binary releases Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 22:03:37 +0100 Message-ID: <20180121210337.GA19261@thebird.nl> References: <87lggva1l8.fsf@gnu.org> <87po631d23.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35955) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edMpW-0005xD-Nf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:07:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edMpT-0005uM-J5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:07:06 -0500 Received: from mail.thebird.nl ([95.154.246.10]:46892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edMpT-0005lt-C6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:07:03 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87po631d23.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" , YOANN P , Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 03:50:12PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >=20 > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >=20 > > Including proot-static makes a lot of sense and easily done (it adds > > 3MiB to the result.) We=E2=80=99d need to document it properly thoug= h, > > probably with a new section under =E2=80=9CSetting Up the Daemon=E2=80= =9D. We could > > mention user namespaces as another option for non-root users. > > > > Thoughts? Ricardo? >=20 > I think it=E2=80=99s fine to include it. I wouldn=E2=80=99t know how t= o document its > use, though. Is the idea to run the daemon under proot? Documented on my page guix-no-root. Pj.