From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35678) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebyx1-000073-Mn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 20:25:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebyww-0002vX-ON for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 20:25:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebyww-0002uh-F4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 20:25:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebyww-0004eU-9E for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 20:25:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30110] [PATCH] gnu: vim: Update to 8.0.1428. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:24:00 -0800 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20180118012400.GA10805@jasmine.lan> References: <20180114121516.12798-1-me@tobias.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180114121516.12798-1-me@tobias.gr> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 30110@debbugs.gnu.org --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 01:15:16PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > * gnu/packages/vim.scm (vim): Update to 8.0.1428. > [arguments]: Add =E2=80=98patch-failing-test=E2=80=99 phase. > --- >=20 > Guix, >=20 > I guess (you may take that quite literally) there's something about our > build environment that makes mch_fopen("/dev/stdout") fail. Manually > running >=20 > :call writefile(foo, "/dev/stdout") >=20 > properly gunks up my terminal, so I've just disabled the test. Fixed! >=20 > Submitted in case anyone has a better solution. LGTM, thank you! --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlpf9zAACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjLfxAAvZvuhIYuA2mv9AH3Sb3Wzt4DigtIe8+H+pbJOBYA6b4xNbNJaeGZVzvW lWFvv6YfT1l3/fQJ3m0Olan0MwdvflTaS/VxbhgjTMhaB7Sp5XTkOgDNJhwOTEBZ 4hg4iGk8czlLOaA1v5NvES0vBYRsm7yraA9cbkNvVQqmbpMK/UO+6C/GJOb1/RRW FgBSFUsi9ZDHcDEvpB4fzv3iYhuGHljTe/iVYR25Qu4fW46lpIZJdShtihwCDpdC XSTxVhVDSRKD6x1D0//HLr34qBWFa7dX488PBqpxrxVUSuU4vpcMTIHsv3w3q0o8 IdHpZLT2kEbu3ItLyfL7BcHUbPt+idngjA5CLyXL1t3bF4lV6X91ILu6qNp6eqsj /0o6XbcUTsf3V3klOkv89lX3qiRDoaJqD1f8+IC6S2GNteOIHDU9u04pi/3A2B3H xZFOXabVzZj/tWbOYYKrTAA8eHDq5NzCjMpUOlARYDCSuX4hezwHhMMVmhj73mVO JSv2ku98GnBwJ1Aq2B3WgxmvSseq0MKgg/eSL/qa872nyM7HzCFkBoYC0RfjykgW 7vfjZwc7UsJdusuUwRKDSm7P1ueAenagfbFM8seszBkN7Tgp3rPAuhTzk14pHCZJ AzXZkYMVGZPuJyKNWzPZtnZNkp3yS2dmi4oU13BE9j+loknapGQ= =Jo8v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--