From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebxBb-00032R-1e for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:32:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebxBa-0002By-Dc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:32:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52811) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebxBa-0002Bl-9X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:32:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebxBa-0001y2-3q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:32:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30111] gnu: gcc@7: Apply the 'retpoline' mitigation technique. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:31:51 -0800 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20180117233151.GC17805@jasmine.lan> References: <877esksi62.fsf@gmail.com> <87d12bgpqh.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7xet06p.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7xd6ffu.fsf@gnu.org> <876081u8r0.fsf@gmail.com> <87shb46365.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87shb46365.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 30111@debbugs.gnu.org, Alex Vong --XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 02:11:14PM +0100, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > Hi Alex, >=20 > Alex Vong skribis: >=20 > > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: >=20 > [...] >=20 > >> Do you know if a new 7.x including retpoline support is scheduled for > >> release soon? > >> > > Yes, I think they will appear in 7.3 according to [0]. Also, some > > changes appear to be in gcc-7-branch already[1]. Do you think we should > > wait for it instead? >=20 > Yes, perhaps we should wait for that release. >=20 > What do people think? It depends on whether or not the GCC team is confident in the implementation yet. If they are still working out the kinks then I suggest waiting. --XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlpf3OcACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjJNQ//UuC6aSoDJvXJ0lVIARfuDBn06L0RknkTKqdagEVZOdnmtG7tiHAVUKup HxXPdm6tKflOO7EABb/av2QjcNaDm7JsUhc/NKTNWO0imcFMdODnmX4XF2DcpRgJ heAOhawSYLFIa5mHxj0Z6kCMKKKGz2/uDnx1tAWR5StR96ICStX++WnuSKELPG9b 5vcjbYh6NU8uFKai++lcfZPEVa8+0/d0XdUVxjDLySStsI4MCXwtDVTOEweCxFw9 AbAEMGDY2w/6cvPONn0WXApSynAIYFtTX74oJGtozbGRkfW4eu39Tm/DaDpvxB94 zxI5saZeXToFw7RLhNS2t7Z6n5QjZU4CDVZOl1AG1fR3QNfnDOVegGwC7bWE7Z4/ 65WhnN0AcMHG9V/bQ7uEYR21U5nj9W98WnTddCHAkew0frDfYA1x7LS316FTpDFf KTsUWHl3lSLjrQn7O/tY0r4KnEn5j8nw30BukwsCWFaed0UZwLWHQ5GZktOvvNEy azaM/yTsk9zyBlLAdEsU5gzWf8aCQacxeyYcmgXM0A5KQL5+/FcI+XdHIZN5qTE/ vLgqidBkorWSH2MnW8cf5COx7wBTMrf4p0BjIo9gWRrBf4hK/lrrdlzyhUIMZzui J8kqcoNnuhmRyhSlrcmhrOi/oT4YFl8hTxI0g00G2sRL6MIkyak= =S5+D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00--