From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41395) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebY3a-0001Xs-3M for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:42:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebY3W-00014R-69 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:42:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebY3W-000141-2C for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:42:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebY3V-0007Mi-K4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:42:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#28004] Chromium Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:41:15 -0800 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20180116204115.GA18014@jasmine.lan> References: <87shensfq6.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9p45bb6.fsf@fastmail.com> <20180104191648.custe7w3l57fvbac@abyayala> <87wp0s2ewl.fsf@fastmail.com> <20180108232042.nqjurjr2bcfl2yyc@abyayala> <87373cey5b.fsf@fastmail.com> <87vag16g5z.fsf@gnu.org> <87fu75aar5.fsf@fastmail.com> <87d129a9s7.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d129a9s7.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 28004@debbugs.gnu.org --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 08:22:32PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > > Marius Bakke wrote on 16/01/18 at 20:01: > >> Not sure what to put in the description. Can I hire Tobias for this? = :P > > > > You probably don't want me writing what I think of Chromium. >=20 > LOL, fair enough. >=20 > I tend to assume zero-knowledge when writing descriptions and have been > playing on spins of "Chromium is a browser designed to spy on the user", > but carrying software with that description does not reflect very well > on us...besides, I've gone great lengths to remove those antifeatures. >=20 > I'd like to make it very clear that users concerned about privacy should > prefer GNU IceCat though... Suggestions welcome. :-) The Synopses and Descriptions section of the manual says "Please avoid marketing phrases" and "try to be factual, mentioning use cases and features". I think we should also avoid "anti-marketing" language. Why not keep it simple and say something like this: "Chromium is a graphical web browser. This package omits the FOO, BAR, and BAZ features in order to help protect the user's privacy." The IceCat description is similarly terse. --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlpeY2gACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjPSQ/+OLT/vl6OjM8Xo8wIanmBEXBE8QbJce6ohtSnNJzD9SsZsU6ZGlkYG8Xo 2cK37vqHalm5N0YPHwnEEh9Fjx5MuM/fODBeiKJtHezr8oHznCqQK3hhMVqxSxIk G3+hQ76hUsiSzZb/EKClIdEEiwYm7Q6nP2k2KSudq/PDEJriJU0jtiKKdVp1de1t +wLccj9ytsr7hQQEhxVeE67eLqO+V5qpLZ8qYmsr+kS/PDn9Qd+KJg7ExSA5zD9Z ROzKXh6OyAIoLVWB9le1oprrKio96zvFw2A1fhDMmA2eYZ+sN9RyBohnzAAHxUxl jBSOBb65EAxkSEH0eeH4HBE5A7y08upvw0WBNZhTqCBRa2yLAxASjaemO3Tcw94u GJCCW50nIsMon1/ruf8ORlSi/SMG7ogd2wj6Kv3PjEBeou2G8lzt+GAiNn3O5Xee 5k9Ji/M8nHUKMLJseOMFlp4w3lVWRObvifSPGLcL3DSrT6v+h+yUM9/hGq51/ka6 QDiMj7h1xKpHr1IYUo665I2kXllmTHe9PiPb9PwX3v1R2Kp5O0ev58JVnskVcewk L6HamgKS6l42Mwj0L0DlVPpwCLwIebwkAKRmux40qKbAog0m0ybT3sTuv3qZyGQo TkXk/sh71/uR9eyDISneOIRMZb10qObHbu2Zx8knmY9tM/d51+Q= =ps9d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huq684BweRXVnRxX--