From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39547) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZGjd-0002I5-Pw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZGja-0004Uq-I0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZGja-0004UZ-Di for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZGja-0006rL-3W for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30037] [PATCH] gnu: whois: Remove bundled mkpasswd. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:46:55 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20180110144655.iq4q7spqf3ng5w2y@abyayala> References: <20180109010138.29740-1-me@tobias.gr> <877esrtaqe.fsf@gnu.org> <11ef27fb-447c-254e-fd07-6574cdf26ed9@tobias.gr> <87shbf2c98.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z5bgu72e3hf6pis2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87shbf2c98.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 30037@debbugs.gnu.org --z5bgu72e3hf6pis2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marius Bakke transcribed 1.3K bytes: > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: >=20 > > Ludo', > > > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote on 09/01/18 at 14:36: > >> LGTM, thanks! > > > > Thanks. However, I'm now convinced that this program is confusingly > > named but belongs where it is, and we should simply remove the TODO > > comment. It's not =E2=80=98bundled=E2=80=99 in the sense of the word we= use. > > > > If no-one objects I'll do just that & close this bug. >=20 > LGTM! >=20 > I was just about to write that I actually *use* this software, and > suggest doing the same thing. It's a convenient tool for generating a > password string suitable for /etc/shadow. And it's tiny, so separating > it out seems "overkill". Which is exactly what we concluded in the old thread about this, which I suggested to read. I just should've removed the TODO note a long time ago. I still find mkpasswd feels like an historical accident bundling in favor of some OS that relies on it (iirc the old thread or authors replies), but doesn't really matter. Bikeshedding on the highest level of bikesheds I guess. --=20 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys WWW: https://n0.is/a/ :: https://ea.n0.is --z5bgu72e3hf6pis2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlpWJ18ACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYijQBAAl/+1TcxlsiyEBrBDXez2IUd1JKZq+hATv15X19CMC1BwHeGURDTAYIrq BEW7K1zaE9bfQxN1hwdrbLl57BCPis/J+bUiseHVvLleqlVk96i7nzdby2Vyk8tr k2Br/HPpex+ayuDVe9VjsQNun2hlkbqA2U3JlwNNHjfB5YHxrdQ82p/UvxsIXjlu TeZg4Sp/v/OQuGoxiBj00G9ojPAIPPh8hfrH8GYy+YjJe2S1xVX4rcSaCqnVLMft 0slwvuk5dAqBFwIOk9iYloTTE2mlMsbTczEU4fZ9HyyG2He/kjPUZBLHOTOzX26T GT0PnffSNjYsv9qR9IQAEsKJc2wzcjiK/k8jURKOUYxLC4ORF/csWBMFeXzHcNWk zPNg9wkfJddPryoPfRIBH3G93Z3vY0AnPMGIGJCVgk9CGBlKeonQaC2VoTEABdxd 7J836Y+NXKHVPwdh4PsILu0/maHkERL+oahIJ1YoqkmO0D9yKGyMixYRBq28pN2u cmZvPykTXwPt5jlX6l5xIn0ENB7dqPIo3fLBjVzE+SzXG3rJVn2roUKYGNdB6ZYp 1Iw6ZKrtQiORHgLcBBRaMj4FfCFWMRABgB3rparUmiKYn/pWUwi99uJQ7F8SJNl1 PQrAYgzgd63SevqbGZ4ypA6GZ5h8+Lo96qNtU5fKZC9n/RI/jNc= =9Onq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z5bgu72e3hf6pis2--