From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38157) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYgnv-0000aF-LF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 18:26:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYgnq-00069O-LE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 18:26:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33203) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYgnq-000694-Ci for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 18:26:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eYgnq-0002oO-6X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 18:26:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30034] [PATCH] Update guile-bytestructures to 1.0.1. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 23:25:24 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20180108232524.vaovlxmm7oj2abrm@abyayala> References: <88cbda9d7e246e6ae4eaaebcbcc8b777@hypermove.net> <1de49c11cb37e97b172ca3be5fdc27e3@hypermove.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xk477nlcsexyovpp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1de49c11cb37e97b172ca3be5fdc27e3@hypermove.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Amirouche Boubekki Cc: 30034@debbugs.gnu.org --xk477nlcsexyovpp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 0.4K bytes: > Le 2018-01-08 23:59, Amirouche Boubekki a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > > Le 2018-01-08 23:53, Amirouche Boubekki a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > > > Becarful guix depends on guile-git which depends on > > > guile-bytestructures. > >=20 > > I am not sure which tests I must run to make sure guix is not broken. > > Let me know, what manual tests are required. >=20 > I managed to install 'guix' with the new 'guile-bytestructures' > and 'guix pull' works. I'm sceptic about the change of the build system together with the update. There must be a reason we used trivial-build-system in Guix, or is it just that the software had no proper tooling for builds until 1.0 and 1.0.1? --=20 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys WWW: https://n0.is/a/ :: https://ea.n0.is --xk477nlcsexyovpp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlpT/eQACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYiXpBAAsBUswkyPbIzBRMuzArfRc9Ddeo7ZHYCjrEcNFl6+IAFjV8itt/2lADO9 nwKuwpkNkj4X4LekfUuqney4C9qLQdvZE/JAnSG/Twj8CiQ9EtdQTe5A2uR9cQSe AOPNWh3OtF3KrTFFn4OTSV7wT8PqZpyepEw/DHP/8WDJLs2jCYtC4zy3yPi2QfO4 cqkxPOwWKCpkyyRBDiyy1NfZHGAQhn0qDuE1noep3NS+o3oL2YHJRst+Pzz/xDza 4gnRzJg+huqXOWcS3FApVIaUbtCHQyHoox1+L/sElBMpXQzAfHu4Qxe6jPHWiY9D v8LPVmxnvfRNGO/Rj7EUofoB2GoScj+7uqha3G4DaiBRgfLEnJmsiyJIzziC7JWN iTY5szhuYq4b+p4ZwS47QGuLE+lhALDEq59ImUV2GpHhXNeEGinoWiTNxhGzkTzc 1KiCPI0kVHXMuRM4T+DC86gUYPoNMxwk+1Gv7ssLCYvRdCJvpQnFNhh+OVyKxQAN 1xvEMVrEPShIfT5ZWM4oUYoDkOvleMMTjR67j25+OxtDRnoZ2WU9M9o3Wt4LI2/+ y/QJqSYT2BYqTleNe+7u7fBVNr4uY0DtDl2tLrM6RJ8b7p8c+gpqFJ26Ig09ne+w 5hU+H3d4cuKa8fBEFALVHB/CRowYp0hP9V2XRFid3rhwgk1esik= =nBDS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xk477nlcsexyovpp--