From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44514) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eX9Q2-0002WK-CI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 12:35:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eX9Py-0006Ex-E5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 12:35:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55467) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eX9Py-0006EQ-9b for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 12:35:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eX9Py-0004q0-3B for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 12:35:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 12:34:22 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20180104173422.GB6465@jasmine.lan> References: <20180104022157.27354-1-me@tobias.gr> <20180104025937.GA25138@jasmine.lan> <6a8f089c-e60e-c4ad-9ec3-e4a82afde605@tobias.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6a8f089c-e60e-c4ad-9ec3-e4a82afde605@tobias.gr> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 29973@debbugs.gnu.org --FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:54:28PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Leo, >=20 > Leo Famulari wrote on 04/01/18 at 03:59: > >> While our Newsbeuter shouldn't be outright vulnerable (thanks to Leo a= nd > >> Efraim), and newsbeuter.org might be only temporarily off-line, what do > >> we think about blessing its successor? Surely it's but a one-line patc= h. > > > > I think it's a good idea! >=20 > Good to hear! Any chance there's a less silly way to make the change? I'm not sure what's silly about it? Is there something that requires the package definition to be moved? --FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlpOZZ4ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgSXhAAtwSKjnJUSegxHXg2YDYONtp/tuMkMDRaIMjX9dIkpBhfji+U2EsR0ThI IOWuPvLY7HOVuv/mYA+CzjyWmxkxrL6iCo0xZj70YkH80ZfyHyCN1sQfvXIoKLqd ObOVyMPC0q6gXDGuuNhYa+4CrqqDS3fkzldQJDWGDgl/nTclhlRavcQiJTYe8dRs A6cOjRpY7PA86xXaFHZkmP69CkO3DgbaLaPiS1pcWaaJJtng6HFCCgnb77hM4S26 9EVNXM7eKMWUG9pKvyKFrod5fzXSJ+igRzOBwXynJoLFfQDeGYVsK8MQH6blGXfC YGvbE9M/kn0SsDTMLedNZmsxoFbaLJ3IyQYSFAH/+NuSLZqDE1I0LqKBWLzyeZma 3tArJx3+LhFdlz0bzzj+OFPBo4/VONsXO1OAXCyyoEmAJcUoV37PjA/phSursRSe LGxIRUQQJYal6vO1m4W1t9ntqZuv3f+5VxXY/CRSdL3VanWiiA41T4CbW8yvgYgC MH818+P1NA8UUrj83XsOztsmAV/zAJVw1l4jnmLtv11FrjCjm/oRiwNSwOY2rnP9 ZJd9hQoglgRxar0nlLULWkTIKDaeCKkazczO06qiRbQqkSyyS4qZSHgZXynykPGQ YMJjk7vHIerxLwkz91xQjFq5BQPmssguG7CCYgyw8H7zdND1B8c= =ZRio -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW--