From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rutger Helling Subject: Re: Building with multiple architectures Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 15:07:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20171231150703.5f8d1be3@mykolab.com> References: <20171230171553.71675704@mykolab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/nqwP+kK/kLTzoH9NxfTk1bU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54071) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eVeGs-0006Zv-8C for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 09:07:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eVeGo-0008BO-UA for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 09:07:26 -0500 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.42]:16606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eVeGo-00089t-M8 for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 09:07:22 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38A83FE for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 15:07:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uV_ZV_JSQTnN for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 15:07:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.3]) by ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90555179 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 15:07:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from ext-subm003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.3]) by int-mx003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53A7FA67 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 15:07:19 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20171230171553.71675704@mykolab.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: help-guix@gnu.org --Sig_/nqwP+kK/kLTzoH9NxfTk1bU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've already solved this via a different way, but it's still an interesting question I guess. I think the only way to do it is via specifying #:system in arguments for an input to force it to build for a certain architecture? On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 17:15:53 +0100 Rutger Helling wrote: > Hey Guix, >=20 > is it possible to specify a specific architecture for an input? I'm > trying to build Wine with WOW64 (meaning both 32-bit and 64-bit=20 > support at once), however this requires that I need access to both > 32-bit and 64-bit (i686/x86_64) inputs. --Sig_/nqwP+kK/kLTzoH9NxfTk1bU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEAVThuRzJ2e93ZI3n86cn20T8yjYFAlpI7wcACgkQ86cn20T8 yjZiDAgAt9HiHrufmO5fbD/1dZDIDd/feL+3f6NFpShE8NCRw4eAS5zPJ5ZFCNby taFukTxqy/1jvXWr7CoOuWowE8if6S325593euTC2lgc82r5wuVTF8VPpHrQZnxN usblDe49rRyr7mGGo2Mv7egnUflwTqbnojs5ARyQ6EYuZ+AzWveKD15rnb+4OzPc fwxpBoB+5eeHYG7/J168iFtxIJOpsoKwKoJqPdHd2I8jTFFoNxuafm95xJmg8u08 eR6q4zwzyGGHsD0JHKXThupqMIK98jZOBLQg2w33rNSOa5lNAemf23auvSpMitAg QmhHVRewWeliTz4Nw0vlM3uXzsggKA== =Bq6n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/nqwP+kK/kLTzoH9NxfTk1bU--