From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: bug#28578: xorg not starting on x200 due to recent commit Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:42:39 +0000 Message-ID: <20171225114239.ku5obh7mvtbo6dmb@abyayala> References: <87a81k86jt.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87fubb1vnd.fsf@gmail.com> <20170925193354.GA12982@jasmine.lan> <87a81izbcd.fsf@gmail.com> <87k20lsj7i.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87fu82mmm3.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20171222232545.1b663977@scratchpost.org> <87mv2am92t.fsf@netris.org> <87fu800zyo.fsf@dustycloud.org> <877etbqzav.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pxkbxw3bccckbbdj" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53881) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eTRAt-0002hD-E4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 06:44:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eTRAo-0007st-EF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 06:44:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eTRAo-0007sc-9Y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 06:44:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eTRAn-0005Zo-PJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 06:44:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877etbqzav.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mike Gerwitz Cc: Andy Wingo , 28578@debbugs.gnu.org --pxkbxw3bccckbbdj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Gerwitz transcribed 1.6K bytes: > On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 11:59:11 -0600, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > > It looks the same. Maybe the Libreboot version is responsible... I'm > > not sure. >=20 > I just received mine recently from Libiquity and I haven't had a chance > to play around with any of the flashing tools, so I don't know my > version atm. If you know the steps to run a suitable comparison, I'd be > happy to do so. >=20 > If you don't have it figured out by March I'll be at LP2018 if you want > to do a more hands-on comparison. >=20 > --=20 > Mike Gerwitz > Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer > GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05 > https://mikegerwitz.com Chris, fyi libreboot is working towards a new release now (they have started testing machines and call out for testers), so maybe whatever you experience will be gone with a new version of libreboot. --=20 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys WWW: https://n0.is --pxkbxw3bccckbbdj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlpA5C8ACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYiyTg//VGD/EdBg+dG1FLUzQFI2Bg4uuFIj0x3JQkKf4uZ6dBvGCthWibf64BY2 GCU/JBNWXvHWcC4hLILDsEwfDq5kSIwBqPTRw+tI62uAJV7a26PX00vJPQ703ApW zUWphEvKaJITAxhNqN2gQYiJPZ1oneDTkoPTQkREQ3zk0lpSwdFqK2AtyitPSq2S QhISUJUhqSYMzK8U3ZFxIwldG/SVmJHMHKyX5jVvKOgi8FujDlGjifvUYtrjdNW9 CZnDDl0Tyk5qTr5SS7RZS9YbaXO7aUTo30AIjRNzNufX+Y222RFZ39OxoHgy4eE/ otbHc1FvDIDEQxVQwJF0FRsyRRtDuxxOPrewH03xmbMbCA/aP68QcgTkX060siMq ZWsv0grg7MaCDizn3gQoQQHiR6sdHj2Wa5yzNSdWXwEN+obBgn5zW3tAy4R93U0/ l8GGSbCaN7rho5ec0UX0ujHIVgKiF9EZD0jITCnix2H+DW85G2x9C0kHEomny+JG PXCDUKOdK76QiGPejbbVqbzERpzAo7rdS7F6WXyR8kyY+kwt5Fjp06xQWLmbXaHL L7C5yZcZGjdexmZCFkl3DKaAkC2K31KwKQk0d2GFXCfwsXWBupbEjx0+RYIOi1x4 X0UkJn35N4zawtxJDLE7GJu2Yqp5tPx/jzPBlMDV4QUMcNEFP0w= =KQ4j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pxkbxw3bccckbbdj--