From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49599) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQrhT-0003cp-5T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:27:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQrhO-0001nt-7O for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:27:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59189) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQrhO-0001nN-3a for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:27:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eQrhN-00006p-UX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:27:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#29745] [PATCH 0/3] Disallow phase returning . Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:26:08 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20171218092608.GA2257@jurong> References: <20171216231242.12032-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <87efnt9tvw.fsf@gnu.org> <87zi6gxy6a.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87zi6gxy6a.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 29745@debbugs.gnu.org On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:01:01AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I’m not opposed to changing things though. For instance we could change > the return value of ‘substitute*’ to be #t on success; similarly for > ‘install-file’. > > What do people think? I agree, since I never understood why the function does not return a truth value, if it is something we are interested in later for our phases. Andreas