Re: [bug#29708] Update s-shell

[ng0 <ng0@n0.is>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1218 bytes --]

Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.4K bytes:
> ng0 <ng0@n0.is> skribis:
> 
> > From cf2cbe9e9e525aa9dd697fcedb255a0fbc194ac9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: ng0 <ng0@n0.is>
> > Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:22:58 +0000
> > Subject: [PATCH] s-shell: Update to commit
> >  da2e5c20c0c5f477ec3426dc2584889a789b1659.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/shells.scm (s-shell): Update to commit da2e5c20c0c5f477ec3426dc2584889a789b1659.
> > (version): Use 'git-version'.
> 
> I adjusted the commit log and pushed.

Why is it [version]? Shouldn't it be (version)?
Even though [version] now makes sense, I've seen
mostly [] when it followed a () - and that's why
I've been using ()[] and never(?) [] on its own.

I haven't read HACKING or the chapter 'Contributing' in a while,
so you might be describing something that's already in there. If
it isn't, does it matter to agree on a fixed grammar for this?
I've come to appreciate the strong QA and checks, but what matters
is the content of the brackets, not the chosen form of brackets.
For ()[] it makes sense.

> Thanks!
> 
> Ludo’.
> 

-- 
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys
  WWW: https://n0.is

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]