From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Boddie Subject: Re: Bootstrapping on a new platform Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 17:29:22 +0100 Message-ID: <201712121729.24154.paul@boddie.org.uk> References: <201712030017.19982.paul@boddie.org.uk> <201712111736.12484.paul@boddie.org.uk> <87indcorjg.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34333) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOnRE-0006z5-CK for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:29:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOnRA-0002SZ-DI for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:29:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87indcorjg.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: help-guix@gnu.org On Tuesday 12. December 2017 17.10.59 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Paul Boddie skribis: > >=20 > > Sorry for the noise, but I guess this is what happens when someone tries > > to do things the hard way. Thanks for identifying the cause of the > > problem! >=20 > Great that you found out! I'll keep you posted about the end result. I managed to encounter a problem= =20 with User Mode Linux that is known: do_syscall_stub : ret =3D -12, offset =3D 1052680, data =3D 09b80008 do_syscall_stub: syscall 192 failed, return value =3D 0xfffffff4, expected= =20 return value =3D 0x1cff8000 syscall parameters: 0x1cff8000 0x1000 0x7 0x11 0x3 0xd464 =46ailed to flush page for address 0x1cff8000 Apparently, this scary error, which causes the offending process to termina= te,=20 is the result of an insufficiently large value in /proc/sys/vm/max_map_coun= t.=20 Since I don't have huge amounts of memory by modern standards, I'm used to= =20 occasional problems with UML, and I guess that some of the build tasks are= =20 quite demanding. Hopefully, I'll be able to complete the build of GCC 5.4, which is the thin= g=20 that repeatably causes this. Then we'll see what happens. Thanks once again! Paul