From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#27943: tar complains about too-long names (guix release) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 13:20:59 -0500 Message-ID: <20171201182059.GA2324@jasmine.lan> References: <20170804092212.77f65fef@scratchpost.org> <87shcyzdhg.fsf@gnu.org> <20171130130510.GT991@macbook41> <877eu750rb.fsf@gnu.org> <20171130214901.GA19582@macbook41> <20171130231220.GA908@jasmine.lan> <87k1y6e6km.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKpws-0001MH-90 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 13:22:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKpwo-0005zL-0n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 13:22:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKpwn-0005zF-Sy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 13:22:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKpwn-0005Tr-Mz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 13:22:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k1y6e6km.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27943@debbugs.gnu.org --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:50:01PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Maybe =E2=80=98lint-hidden-vulnerabilities=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=98hidden-vu= lnerabilities=E2=80=99, or > =E2=80=98ignored-vulnerabilities=E2=80=99, or=E2=80=A6? What=E2=80=99s y= ou preference? :-) I like 'lint-hidden-vulnerabilities' because it communicates that we are "hiding" a vulnerability somehow and that it's related to the linter. Maybe even 'lint-hidden-cve', since it's really about the CVE system and not so much about vulnerabilities as vulnerabilities. > Would you be OK with a more appropriate name and the understanding that > it=E2=80=99s there to address rare cases like this one? Yes, definitely! --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlohnYsACgkQJkb6MLrK fwivJhAAmqe/GNiLu+MUezbP2wUv96wijcpR1lT5wP0RZatNYNWOoIlttZBm9ea8 j/bsJYaNve2owUBgRQrkGqqH9jevDjIUlKSCYSYR7oim78iFIaxVzyb4vt/3E6Jm L11+fr/kTyGtecW4/c0Xq8JSmfGyeGc5cSpgwCu15Qy8KySjRUZMJo5PS0MHqZ/w IK9Gex2gmtPOfhXj2fknTA3HMsuZ2GQiOB4O18pJ/kJl8WHgamEmy8q42h8NX0n0 4rD4yex5ODm9UCXMKRzo+4cAGdbE4dApDyxhm7FGR/Zz4s3pB9SWn2udOsd/mBJq gK2tnIpou9gXFqqoXP64HSgIsNI5vc8Z3VyZKGz+pbgj/b9+QmIJpQq6Acpd+d7i uZNwFVf2v28PeeLtHeWvpT9BVLYjS7cTZ8kTPBMr0pT5/3ZfAOZuB3aAuXJi6NQl 3Hfb1IY2yMnN53KYcNanW/GxkYBPv3Az+W69d9UyfKtK4cNuu/A3g7YtSt8BXlYz oLuXL0L/zd4PoSNclxGrlRWO0P61ajO0IFPfvCccdIFHPB91JKKYtvamSsBAKjX+ PrSfD3SbckEEKr3W8f09td09EAbbuFt9l6XGWcsYj448dC6CXVY5iXhLwFhOGpQt eH7+kC1TfWMGLmeGddviMe3Mo+F2mhfHTMq3V0Ea0w9b/4D/ZHw= =Axiu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--