From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Is anyone opposed to GnuTLS with DANE by default? Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:54:57 +0000 Message-ID: <20171114185457.uo2fp55z2svqcen5@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="da56f6a5htfvrora" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEgMh-00018Y-7h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:55:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEgMe-00008j-31 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:55:19 -0500 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:59576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEgMd-0008W7-Oy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:55:15 -0500 Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eEgMb-0003un-Qg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:55:13 +0100 Received: from tor.tocici.com ([199.127.226.150] helo=localhost) by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1eEgMQ-0003QU-Hl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:55:03 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --da56f6a5htfvrora Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have some minutes to work on Guix tomorrow, and with the libwget2 patch pending QA I thought it would probably be better to build GnuTLS with DANE support by default. I would remove the gnutls/dane package definition, add unbound to the inputs of gnutls and adjust the packages that depend on this gnutls. If no one is opposed to this change, I will prepare a patch tomorrow. --=20 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://dl.n0.is/dist/keys/ WWW: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is --da56f6a5htfvrora Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAloLPAEACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYgg4BAAi5BVRgPuT17tNSgQwF3L0246hkBQuJQyVWX1uOlWOC97YdxxScY4la1g OafUqPRqFVHcxr/8oMLyVsgTp4dPspbTiMeDOFhenL36ZQmcVojZX/KzuGAfWigl 3wmt22TfSPURMD85pi7iv8RMh8qvvXMQEfZ6VYPRkJFqByoCw5pf17cOfvTDs70v UpfJEiwxoPNt1tP8dgZt3nmvuLB2FE79JP0yLotB624MJ9CNcxLZ9E4Ix42wwj/R mDmUEkNWLWD04d4yM4yhy4TSW2RncKGdcKdLnlQk4FFloacV7U/sd40vAvlku4Jz rB13DJ53cHEfOqM51fiv6MzsGoi2+WLjA12e5JQ9zeoOFiI3a0armr9MZQpVDL1f MBeW4hd1ibMqfbESfeJCSI/S2Yi9hEhe02wdA0hNec6uh1gr4UEAAwDA8lz3euR0 sH9tVLTI5t1jSns0vask6ynhg1pO6dlGaRt7LwOr5wXdh57NgWqkwSKUeh1y62x7 ol+re3JTTRWoJ/yiupVQTAIozwtonCFehkfUploSLLkoCIVbuSJaWfrXDDfCYagQ 9TXVhV/KBP1XkXDswFdpoHeSanPOIve0QVQOHI/23FMGVuGWjT/NxnCinF/u5q2B M5hDJcX5H9+ODiemHPmUP625NB0A8XNJwAxxOF9DWjIPJIxtAy0= =NeK6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --da56f6a5htfvrora--