From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: boot the Hurd with Guix Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:50:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20171113105024.tvfkan54xzj7dbpv@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> References: <20171112210310.80B0E4E0031@mta-1.openmailbox.og> <87fu9iv4sm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50639) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eECJz-0003SQ-NQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:50:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eECJz-0001Qz-53 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:50:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fu9iv4sm.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel , rennes@openmailbox.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org Hello, Ludovic Courtès, on lun. 13 nov. 2017 11:42:01 +0100, wrote: > PS: guix-daemon no longer depends on ‘lsof’, but it still depends on /proc. Does our procfs have everything it needs already? Samuel