From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Let's build 'core-updates'! Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 23:29:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20171102212917.GA3376@macbook41> References: <87wp382zgh.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47804) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eAN3E-0000s3-OW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:29:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eAN39-0007os-O8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:29:24 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:34451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eAN39-0007oP-H4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:29:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wp382zgh.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:33:02PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Hello! >=20 > 'core-updates' is a month overdue, so now is a good time to start it. >=20 > We are still missing the "binutils" update. Efraim, do you remember > what the issue with 2.29 was? binutils-boot0 built fine, I don't remember what the next -boot0 package was, but it failed completely so I reverted it. I was also worried about all the CVEs showing up, and the couple that I checked didn't affect 2.28.1. >=20 > Is there anything else we should consider this round? Maybe the > automatic wrapping from ? We should update cmake. It would also be nice if we could get rid of some of libjpeg-8 and other similar older versions, but that's something that can wait for the next round if need be. We've already added the python update branch in, so we should make sure to update the packages like pytest to only have the later version. If we have any more packages without modify-phases that can be taken care of also. I'm currently building out to gtk+ and gtk+@2 on aarch64 to see how everything goes. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAln7jioACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1ErIA//WPBfuIq7B2Kae0rVA8oTo34PH5sYN3TjGV6qVV6TX/9kAmysxSDocYYK hwrqPkAH9FAsTdZJZOBf2kEHp+VhSczFJbmx9LV+6J30yGxGctUjFCS3ilHg8etl 4hHt1fF0FIT2lcBkw4EoZnDR1tzQNyUualTeUBsQUgDEI5nN9gO0xvz28+MdhBpZ VT8wpgJk7bDZr7ixHi6bd/Siq84ONGD7Y10wY1VoAL1ApB/6xK1hZsGUQD9b9jwS B/1PMRAZS1A8So9/J/fZe8NI/xVI8ZN6CnEiZ/193GMQQGhmRjY7wTl/381JMix+ lTPRAdBUks9gVRbgVus+skoS6niDkmuvtKkKeIB5USXNiK7Bt+FM/0lWJesogHcJ FLR3llDwXL5wGWUOPFwwzbWVsNMg1YDr1HOlIFVv+UCeHi3w6Lq97Xr2U18Xd5u6 UF5PYmHeYj3JSBGGS+3QBNFYVnK2sk2mZ/cxc4oF1F9H0Ja+6iFeivZ7toxfJULf 8y/BxXyoguGvfjMp1QGHfMF1trgq3g9ijANLFYA7MIIrtFCqkPaALMdPwtjDDZnH EncKqFdyt3ZGevWRXwqgJ3lDndXow3JDLSfr5M73BdYtE+TV+fN0NFZXvtbDKrvE T0/em1nStJMsHvf9/ZG3e4t4zZBrBWSgcXBOy5U7+XpjfZmi1uY= =3Hfd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--