From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39483) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6Gn7-0004ke-BX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 09:59:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6Gn4-0002Hr-AC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 09:59:49 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6Gn4-0002Hn-6C for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 09:59:46 -0400 Subject: [bug#28841] [PATCH 03/24] gnu: Add java-eclipse-jetty-test-helper. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 14:11:40 +0200 From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <20171022141140.5df9b932@lepiller.eu> In-Reply-To: References: <20171014233216.49c852f7@lepiller.eu> <20171014222349.12902-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <20171014222349.12902-3-julien@lepiller.eu> <87bml441uv.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 28841@debbugs.gnu.org Le Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:57:07 +0200, julien lepiller a =C3=A9crit : > Le 2017-10-18 22:50, Ricardo Wurmus a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > > Hi Julien, > > =20 > >> From: Julien Lepiller > >>=20 > >> * gnu/packages/java.scm (java-eclipse-jetty-test-helper): New > >> variable. =20 > >=20 > > [=E2=80=A6] > >=20 > > I wonder: is there a better place for this than java.scm? The same > > question applies to all other patches in this series. Let=E2=80=99s tr= y to > > avoid a second python.scm situation :) =20 >=20 > eclipse.scm? Or maybe maven.scm, with all other maven bootstrap=20 > dependencies (and maven itself)? Or maven-bootstrap.scm, maven.scm > being for the complete maven built with maven-bootstrap, and all the > plugins of maven? So, I've corrected all your comments, except this one, and I don't want to push without some sort of a consensus. Do I add these packages to java.scm, eclipse.scm, maven.scm, maven-bootstrap.scm? >=20 >=20 >=20