From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Our package names should not include "github-com" Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 06:44:18 -0400 Message-ID: <20171017104418.GA8359@jasmine.lan> References: <20171013014334.17601.30718@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171013014344.D813E20338@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87lgkfhszj.fsf_-_@netris.org> <20171013202425.GA22896@jasmine.lan> <87r2u6h738.fsf@netris.org> <87r2u37wl2.fsf@gmail.com> <20171016213843.GB20802@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e4PMm-0001ns-8Y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 06:44:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e4PMi-0005tl-BQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 06:44:56 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:47417) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e4PMi-0005tU-5f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 06:44:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171016213843.GB20802@jasmine.lan> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:38:43PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > Using the domain name as part of the *upstream* library name is useful > for upstream authors because of how Go's built-in dependency management > tools work. Go integrates dependency management into the language and > the `go` tool itself. Re-using the upstream library name is useful > because they have already disambiguated for us. >=20 > I don't intend to be rude, but I'm not going to put much effort into > responding to further comments that are not based on knowledge of how Go > handles package / dependency management with its built-in tools, or > modular programming in Go, in general. Already I used tons of my free > time to learn this stuff, just so I could make Guix packages of Go > software. Please meet me where I am. >=20 > Again, I don't see an ethical problem here, so any motivation for me to > participate in this discussion, as a volunteer, must be technical. If > it's *wrong* to name the packages in this way, I will behave > differently. I replied too harshly here, and I apologize for that. For me, this conversation really started on the wrong foot. --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlnl3v8ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi56xAApU7uAAgT0RKyyrMDvgBzEe2/ZhmY+EchDvDWeS7yRboIsJjfVSzjEK0e RXIh+ibJYkwDq3Y4rXVetRfnSzkMMMf1tzeHVXlkBEv9MqiomKmfzOpMjofGfFa/ WDnmUKd0CSOYK0Zb+OqpFcd0HCPoUQKw2DjxONCK4ylnVqYFYBK8HfUrZWYkHkOQ Sh1ZaMVZBY1y0hWdJ+22ODSuC8j0KGdhPXOpUyftyuLktgyUiNEp42By3rzBA4Zo MmYKSASa9v5LcFZXGTWdM+OYnoYJhDDk5Xo1MGQB1/07lxXBIkoEMSwdEwFf3uFT 97/w+Ws/ALHpr4imQuQyUjmAuPAlo8q8D0MoQA26EK7McvGN5G4WtN59o2r3YNO8 e/BC2N/e/Nalrm35Hs6CVyZsywxUTgKS9gFAE7m7VYt6U9/EukbDiQMsP6chTDre tCWLZaq3mU09OT1+jlaFx6K7rFtsYfyNNrZl++S4PM2tmNDkFi+n5V9QDbiwYtH/ HlA6Kt5gM68cYjKkeXFsIDLCAZPOsUdmU3hx+lfmfLD0s8GlYveTGR2ib9zfDObd 6hWsS3yv774aE7iF8xNdpsuWTE8JXafxB6+m936p48exVoqBw45OQzAFUyHODc/A DoFcZzXJ1pg/qsZ1FGwL5Dm0Hk0zBzgHfLbGxpFnNZRb2iS9A9U= =zd/+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--