From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: bug#28823: lxqt-common is deprecated Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 17:48:17 +0000 Message-ID: <20171016174817.ymfhulbuw3vs7pvi@abyayala> References: <87zi8ueezn.fsf@gmail.com> <87a80tww0a.fsf@gnu.org> <20171014162756.icdtyrmynjjwjoer@abyayala> <87d15ourrt.fsf@gnu.org> <20171015212024.bdemvv2dghrj752e@abyayala> <87efq3im8n.fsf@gnu.org> <20171016134710.ruxvvdx2rwijseva@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dgyoamg4wgntam7m" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60290) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e49Vj-0004XT-5J for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:49:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e49Ve-0002tM-6W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:49:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35498) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e49Ve-0002t5-1u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:49:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e49Vd-0007LW-LV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:49:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171016134710.ruxvvdx2rwijseva@abyayala> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 28823@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer --dgyoamg4wgntam7m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ng0 transcribed 1.7K bytes: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s transcribed 0.2K bytes: > > Hello, > >=20 > > Since nothing depends on lxqt-common, I suggest removing it. We can > > always revisit this decision later if needed. > >=20 > > Objections? >=20 > Yes, I have objections. > Please give me 14 days (until 2017-10-30) time to look into my current LX= QT branch > and the work that needs to be done for an LXQT Desktop to report > on wether LXQT really moved away from this or if it is still > needed by applications we do not (yet!) have. >=20 > > Thanks, > > Ludo=E2=80=99. > >=20 Okay, we still require it. The last LXQT release is 0.11.1, and lxqt-session requires lxqt-common. lxqt-notificationsd 0.11.1 still depends on lxqt-common. Probably some more packages depend on it, but more than 1 is already enough for me NOT to kick it out. I would appreciate if we would drop this until the tarballs no longer requi= re it. --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://dist.ng0.infotropique.org/dist/keys/ https://www.infotropique.org https://ng0.infotropique.org --dgyoamg4wgntam7m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlnk8OEACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYgrsw/9GT8J1C0DpxDEE9Mm5N2F8lW/mz5v8vv998mGiCEiOwNfzVcc7/Uy6nW9 GqcJxomyVf9BwUqKQNgZZhjcEarWQSwr5ecz/9x8kQ5mY/EyZ2z0b+y9e3OUoI9Y jM0z2Mbl/ao2kSVAlUNujCaMAS3r3QnCZReFywhhTYG91zyPr4D2oN92lnAsaaD3 dn+3rxqzFiCYzARcYCAOHyza8sgcfJ7s7L2J5a9v1Vr6/p71zZrqYsrkj2zd208N /l1YEDPmxyFjYAAdukwZX9LEKFW4yfon/WM21OgT4qUxtkDq5K/c0p+HGtFkEbcp qA6gUc6ndLGy4xDFSMRrT5SisO3gvOnn9CcYbH9whpHrP66OCzAqwpSBOpX7duVZ Pv07gW0qji2G1wsPogUwfO1gGhOfaK+BTfZgYiQh7EAouPbkuQT/PL/C1Z5zoeOH U7EIfXZgAtmmNw1PEeCV2spLS46gnRBFvBM0hWtRSepN19b5yBPg8nQTLjHVKT0G wFG8/ABkVTfQ4mJAj5Un2H2FFKZWjVfgsqwv18t3Vrlzi9cRbMrK+z1mY0Zdjwr5 r12uWZuVnKguMy9On9w/9TR6ojgYxVMK1ZrOdQxEInD9L+fPB7e1uO99uAhWk6pN qHdfW5nX3qFcpbXuERlIhXtRsXVvWAlAlkxp2+lsDcPGm5Q2w+c= =2+Yf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dgyoamg4wgntam7m--